TSTP Solution File: LCL152-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : LCL152-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:44:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.41s 7.70s
% Output   : Refutation 7.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : LCL152-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 07:40:44 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 4.10/4.44  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 4.10/4.44  Process 24442 was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 4.10/4.44  Sun Jul  3 07:40:45 2022
% 4.10/4.44  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_24288_n013.cluster.edu".
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_24288_n013.cluster.edu
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 4.10/4.44  set(auto2).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 4.10/4.44      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 4.10/4.44      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 4.10/4.44      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 4.10/4.44  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 4.10/4.44  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 4.10/4.44  assign(order,kbo).
% 4.10/4.44  set(lex_order_vars).
% 4.10/4.44  clear(print_given).
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (9 formulas)
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 4.10/4.44  1 implies(A,B) != truth | ordered(A,B) # label(partial_order_definition2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 4.10/4.44  2 -ordered(A,B) | implies(A,B) = truth # label(partial_order_definition1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Auto_denials:
% 4.10/4.44    % copying label prove_wajsberg_theorem to answer in negative clause
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Term ordering decisions:
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  % Assigning unary symbol not kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (9).
% 4.10/4.44  Function symbol KB weights:  truth=1. x=1. y=1. z=1. implies=1. big_V=1. big_hat=1. not=0.
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=55.000, iters=3355
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=52.000, iters=3336
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=50.000, iters=3369
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=47.000, iters=3342
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=46.000, iters=3367
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=44.000, iters=3339
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=43.000, iters=3365
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=41.000, iters=3386
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=40.000, iters=3335
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=39.000, iters=3358
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=37.000, iters=3345
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=36.000, iters=3341
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=35.000, iters=3336
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=34.000, iters=3335
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=33.000, iters=3342
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=32.000, iters=3346
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=31.000, iters=3345
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=30.000, iters=3355
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=29.000, iters=3340
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=28.000, iters=3411
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=27.000, iters=3379
% 4.10/4.44  
% 4.10/4.44  Low Water (keep): wt=26.000, iters=3373
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3433
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (keep): wt=24.000, iters=3366
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (keep): wt=23.000, iters=3333
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (keep): wt=22.000, iters=3404
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=7326, wt=113.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=3508, wt=107.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=3648, wt=100.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=7330, wt=92.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=3646, wt=86.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=7502, wt=85.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=7482, wt=84.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=7393, wt=83.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=7392, wt=81.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=6302, wt=80.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=7448, wt=79.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=5595, wt=76.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=12863, wt=20.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3341
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=12986, wt=19.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=13069, wt=18.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=13086, wt=16.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Low Water (displace): id=13352, wt=15.000
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 7.41/7.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.41/7.70  % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  % Proof 1 at 6.53 (+ 0.13) seconds: prove_wajsberg_theorem.
% 7.41/7.70  % Length of proof is 72.
% 7.41/7.70  % Level of proof is 22.
% 7.41/7.70  % Maximum clause weight is 47.000.
% 7.41/7.70  % Given clauses 331.
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  3 implies(truth,A) = A # label(wajsberg_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 7.41/7.70  4 big_V(A,B) = implies(implies(A,B),B) # label(big_V_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 7.41/7.70  5 big_hat(A,B) = not(big_V(not(A),not(B))) # label(big_hat_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 7.41/7.70  6 big_hat(A,B) = not(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),not(B))).  [copy(5),rewrite([4(4)])].
% 7.41/7.70  7 implies(implies(A,B),B) = implies(implies(B,A),A) # label(wajsberg_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 7.41/7.70  8 implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A)) = truth # label(wajsberg_4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 7.41/7.70  9 implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C))) = truth # label(wajsberg_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 7.41/7.70  10 implies(big_hat(x,y),z) != implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)) # label(prove_wajsberg_theorem) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_wajsberg_theorem).  [assumption].
% 7.41/7.70  11 implies(not(implies(implies(not(x),not(y)),not(y))),z) != implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)) # answer(prove_wajsberg_theorem).  [copy(10),rewrite([6(3)])].
% 7.41/7.70  12 implies(implies(A,truth),truth) = implies(A,A).  [para(3(a,1),7(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  13 implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),B) = implies(implies(implies(B,A),A),B).  [para(7(a,1),4(a,2,1)),rewrite([4(2)])].
% 7.41/7.70  14 not(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),not(B))) = not(implies(implies(not(B),not(A)),not(A))).  [para(7(a,1),6(a,2,1)),rewrite([6(1)])].
% 7.41/7.70  15 implies(implies(not(A),not(truth)),A) = truth.  [para(3(a,1),8(a,1,2))].
% 7.41/7.70  16 implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(not(B),not(A))),implies(not(B),not(A))) = implies(A,B).  [para(8(a,1),7(a,1,1)),rewrite([3(3)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  19 implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),B)) = truth.  [para(3(a,1),9(a,1,1)),rewrite([3(3)])].
% 7.41/7.70  20 implies(implies(A,truth),implies(B,implies(A,B))) = truth.  [para(3(a,1),9(a,1,2,1))].
% 7.41/7.70  22 implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),implies(implies(A,C),implies(implies(B,A),C))) = truth.  [para(7(a,1),9(a,1,1))].
% 7.41/7.70  31 implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(A,implies(implies(C,D),implies(B,D)))) = truth.  [para(9(a,1),9(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([3(8)])].
% 7.41/7.70  55 implies(A,A) = truth.  [para(19(a,1),3(a,1)),rewrite([3(3)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  64 implies(A,truth) = truth.  [para(12(a,1),19(a,1,2)),rewrite([55(1)])].
% 7.41/7.70  65 implies(A,implies(B,A)) = truth.  [back_rewrite(20),rewrite([64(2),3(4)])].
% 7.41/7.70  67 implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),A) = implies(B,A).  [para(13(a,1),7(a,1)),rewrite([65(5),3(6)])].
% 7.41/7.70  83 implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(B,C)) = truth.  [para(65(a,1),9(a,1,1)),rewrite([3(6)])].
% 7.41/7.70  85 implies(not(truth),not(not(truth))) = not(not(truth)).  [para(15(a,1),67(a,1,1)),rewrite([3(5)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  99 not(implies(implies(not(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),not(B))),not(C)),not(C))) = not(implies(implies(not(C),not(implies(implies(not(B),not(A)),not(A)))),not(implies(implies(not(B),not(A)),not(A))))).  [para(14(a,1),14(a,1,1,1,1))].
% 7.41/7.70  101 not(implies(implies(not(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),not(B))),not(C)),not(C))) = not(implies(implies(not(C),not(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),not(B)))),not(implies(implies(not(B),not(A)),not(A))))).  [para(14(a,1),14(a,1,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  103 implies(not(A),implies(A,B)) = truth.  [para(8(a,1),83(a,1,1)),rewrite([3(5)])].
% 7.41/7.70  107 implies(not(truth),A) = truth.  [para(15(a,1),83(a,1,1)),rewrite([3(5)])].
% 7.41/7.70  115 not(not(truth)) = truth.  [back_rewrite(85),rewrite([107(6)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  116 implies(implies(A,not(truth)),not(truth)) = A.  [para(107(a,1),7(a,1,1)),rewrite([3(2)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  118 implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),implies(not(A),not(implies(B,A)))),implies(not(A),not(implies(B,A)))) = implies(implies(B,A),A).  [para(7(a,1),16(a,1,1,1))].
% 7.41/7.70  124 implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),not(B)),C),implies(not(C),not(implies(implies(not(B),not(A)),not(A))))),implies(not(C),not(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),not(B))))) = implies(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),not(B)),C).  [para(14(a,1),16(a,1,1,2,2))].
% 7.41/7.70  125 implies(implies(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),not(C)),not(C))),implies(not(implies(implies(not(B),not(C)),not(C))),not(A))),implies(not(implies(implies(not(C),not(B)),not(B))),not(A))) = implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),not(C)),not(C))).  [para(14(a,1),16(a,1,2,1))].
% 7.41/7.70  129 implies(implies(implies(A,B),not(A)),not(A)) = implies(A,B).  [para(103(a,1),7(a,1,1)),rewrite([3(3)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  143 implies(not(implies(A,not(truth))),A) = truth.  [para(116(a,1),8(a,1,2)),rewrite([115(3),3(6)])].
% 7.41/7.70  148 implies(A,implies(not(A),not(truth))) = truth.  [para(143(a,1),8(a,1,1)),rewrite([3(7)])].
% 7.41/7.70  162 implies(not(A),not(truth)) = A.  [para(148(a,1),7(a,1,1)),rewrite([3(6),15(9),3(6)])].
% 7.41/7.70  163 implies(A,not(truth)) = not(A).  [para(162(a,1),7(a,1,1)),rewrite([107(7),3(6)])].
% 7.41/7.70  166 implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,not(A))) = truth.  [para(162(a,1),9(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([163(5)])].
% 7.41/7.70  167 implies(implies(not(A),B),implies(not(B),A)) = truth.  [para(162(a,1),9(a,1,2,2)),rewrite([163(5)])].
% 7.41/7.70  168 not(not(A)) = A.  [para(162(a,1),67(a,2)),rewrite([107(4),3(3),163(4)])].
% 7.41/7.70  172 implies(A,not(B)) = implies(B,not(A)).  [para(168(a,1),16(a,1,1,2,1)),rewrite([166(5),168(3),3(4)])].
% 7.41/7.70  173 implies(not(A),B) = implies(not(B),A).  [para(168(a,1),16(a,1,1,2,2)),rewrite([167(5),168(4),3(4)])].
% 7.41/7.70  179 implies(A,not(implies(A,not(implies(A,B))))) = implies(A,B).  [back_rewrite(129),rewrite([172(3),172(5)])].
% 7.41/7.70  181 implies(A,implies(B,not(implies(B,C)))) = implies(A,implies(C,not(implies(C,B)))).  [back_rewrite(125),rewrite([172(3),168(2),172(3),172(7),168(6),172(7),172(10),168(9),55(9),172(4),168(3),172(4),172(7),168(6),3(6),172(7),168(6),172(7)])].
% 7.41/7.70  182 implies(implies(implies(implies(A,not(implies(A,B))),C),implies(not(C),not(implies(B,not(implies(B,A)))))),implies(not(C),not(implies(A,not(implies(A,B)))))) = implies(implies(A,not(implies(A,B))),C).  [back_rewrite(124),rewrite([172(3),168(2),172(3),172(8),168(7),172(8),172(15),168(14),172(15),172(21),168(20),172(21)])].
% 7.41/7.70  184 not(implies(implies(not(A),not(implies(B,not(implies(B,C))))),not(implies(C,not(implies(C,B)))))) = not(implies(A,not(implies(A,implies(B,not(implies(B,C))))))).  [back_rewrite(101),rewrite([172(3),168(2),172(3),172(6),168(5),172(6),172(11),168(10),172(11),172(16),168(15),172(16)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  186 not(implies(implies(A,not(implies(A,B))),not(implies(not(C),not(implies(A,not(implies(A,B)))))))) = not(implies(C,not(implies(C,implies(B,not(implies(B,A))))))).  [back_rewrite(99),rewrite([172(3),168(2),172(3),172(6),168(5),172(6),172(11),168(10),172(11),172(16),168(15),172(16),172(18)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  192 implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)) != implies(not(z),implies(y,not(implies(y,x)))) # answer(prove_wajsberg_theorem).  [back_rewrite(11),rewrite([172(5),168(4),172(6),173(9)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  228 implies(A,implies(B,not(implies(A,not(B))))) = truth.  [para(172(a,1),19(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([172(2),172(4)])].
% 7.41/7.70  242 implies(implies(A,not(implies(B,not(A)))),B) = implies(not(B),A).  [para(173(a,1),67(a,2)),rewrite([172(4)])].
% 7.41/7.70  265 implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),implies(not(A),not(implies(B,A)))) = truth.  [para(163(a,1),22(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([172(7),3(7)])].
% 7.41/7.70  275 implies(implies(A,B),B) = implies(not(B),not(implies(A,B))).  [back_rewrite(118),rewrite([265(7),3(6)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  351 implies(A,implies(not(B),not(implies(A,B)))) = truth.  [back_rewrite(19),rewrite([275(2)])].
% 7.41/7.70  353 big_V(A,B) = implies(not(B),not(implies(A,B))).  [back_rewrite(4),rewrite([275(3)])].
% 7.41/7.70  406 implies(not(A),implies(B,not(implies(B,A)))) = truth.  [para(228(a,1),173(a,1)),rewrite([172(4),168(3),173(6)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  440 implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),implies(A,C)),implies(not(C),B))) = truth.  [para(351(a,1),31(a,1,1)),rewrite([173(4),3(9)])].
% 7.41/7.70  1257 implies(A,not(implies(A,B))) = implies(B,not(implies(B,A))).  [para(181(a,1),3(a,1)),rewrite([3(5)])].
% 7.41/7.70  1268 implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),not(implies(B,not(implies(B,C)))))) = implies(A,B).  [para(103(a,1),181(a,1,2,2,1)),rewrite([163(4),168(2),172(5)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  1271 implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)) != implies(not(z),implies(x,not(implies(x,y)))) # answer(prove_wajsberg_theorem).  [para(181(a,1),192(a,2))].
% 7.41/7.70  1299 implies(A,implies(implies(B,not(implies(B,C))),not(implies(C,not(implies(B,not(implies(B,C)))))))) = implies(A,C).  [para(406(a,1),181(a,1,2,2,1)),rewrite([163(4),168(2),172(9)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  1577 implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),not(implies(A,not(implies(A,B))))),implies(implies(A,B),not(implies(B,not(implies(B,A)))))),A) = implies(implies(A,B),not(implies(A,not(implies(A,B))))).  [para(275(a,1),182(a,1,1,1)),rewrite([168(3),168(9),168(16),1268(20),172(20)])].
% 7.41/7.70  1730 not(implies(implies(A,B),not(implies(B,not(implies(B,A)))))) = not(A).  [para(103(a,1),184(a,2,1,2,1)),rewrite([168(2),179(5),163(11),168(9)])].
% 7.41/7.70  2403 not(implies(A,not(implies(B,not(implies(B,A)))))) = not(implies(A,B)).  [para(65(a,1),186(a,2,1,2,1)),rewrite([168(6),1730(10),172(5),172(11),168(10),3(9)])].
% 7.41/7.70  2616 implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),not(implies(C,not(implies(C,B)))))) = implies(A,B).  [back_rewrite(1299),rewrite([2403(9),172(6)])].
% 7.41/7.70  2623 implies(implies(A,B),not(implies(A,not(implies(A,B))))) = A.  [back_rewrite(1577),rewrite([2616(13),242(7),103(3),3(2)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  3083 implies(implies(A,B),not(implies(B,not(implies(B,A))))) = A.  [para(1257(a,1),353(a,2,2,1)),rewrite([353(3),168(3),2623(6),168(3)]),flip(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  14085 implies(A,implies(implies(B,implies(A,C)),implies(B,C))) = truth.  [para(168(a,1),440(a,1,2,1,1)),rewrite([172(5),168(4)])].
% 7.41/7.70  14191 implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(B,implies(A,C))) = truth.  [para(14085(a,1),14085(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([3(6)])].
% 7.41/7.70  14392 implies(A,implies(B,C)) = implies(B,implies(A,C)).  [para(14191(a,1),3083(a,1,1)),rewrite([14191(8),172(6),3(6),168(5),3(4)])].
% 7.41/7.70  17727 implies(x,implies(implies(x,y),z)) != implies(x,implies(not(z),not(implies(x,y)))) # answer(prove_wajsberg_theorem).  [back_rewrite(1271),rewrite([14392(7),14392(16)])].
% 7.41/7.70  18033 $F # answer(prove_wajsberg_theorem).  [para(172(a,1),17727(a,2,2)),rewrite([168(14)]),xx(a)].
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.41/7.70  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Given=331. Generated=240001. Kept=18028. proofs=1.
% 7.41/7.70  Usable=103. Sos=4917. Demods=4881. Limbo=0, Disabled=13017. Hints=0.
% 7.41/7.70  Megabytes=18.62.
% 7.41/7.70  User_CPU=6.53, System_CPU=0.13, Wall_clock=7.
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  ============================== end of search =========================
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  THEOREM PROVED
% 7.41/7.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 7.41/7.70  
% 7.41/7.70  Process 24442 exit (max_proofs) Sun Jul  3 07:40:52 2022
% 7.41/7.70  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------