TSTP Solution File: LCL152-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : LCL152-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:23:56 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.69s 0.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   49 (  49 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   49 (  48 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(wajsberg_2,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.deCQo1nu1f/E---3.1_673.p',wajsberg_2) ).

cnf(wajsberg_1,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.deCQo1nu1f/E---3.1_673.p',wajsberg_1) ).

cnf(wajsberg_3,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.deCQo1nu1f/E---3.1_673.p',wajsberg_3) ).

cnf(wajsberg_4,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.deCQo1nu1f/E---3.1_673.p',wajsberg_4) ).

cnf(big_hat_definition,axiom,
    big_hat(X1,X2) = not(big_V(not(X1),not(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.deCQo1nu1f/E---3.1_673.p',big_hat_definition) ).

cnf(big_V_definition,axiom,
    big_V(X1,X2) = implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.deCQo1nu1f/E---3.1_673.p',big_V_definition) ).

cnf(prove_wajsberg_theorem,negated_conjecture,
    implies(big_hat(x,y),z) != implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.deCQo1nu1f/E---3.1_673.p',prove_wajsberg_theorem) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    wajsberg_2 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    wajsberg_1 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    wajsberg_3 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X1),X1)) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    implies(X1,X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    implies(X1,truth) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_13]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    wajsberg_4 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(truth)),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),X1) = implies(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    implies(not(not(truth)),not(truth)) = not(truth),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_14]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    implies(not(truth),not(not(truth))) = not(not(truth)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_12]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    implies(not(truth),X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(implies(X2,X1))),implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    not(not(truth)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    implies(not(implies(X1,not(truth))),X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_8]),c_0_22]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(not(X1),not(truth))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_25]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    big_hat(X1,X2) = not(big_V(not(X1),not(X2))),
    big_hat_definition ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    big_V(X1,X2) = implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),
    big_V_definition ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    implies(not(X1),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_26]),c_0_8]),c_0_17]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    implies(big_hat(x,y),z) != implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)),
    prove_wajsberg_theorem ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    big_hat(X1,X2) = not(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),not(X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    implies(X1,not(truth)) = not(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_29]),c_0_22]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    implies(not(implies(implies(not(x),not(y)),not(y))),z) != implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(not(X2),not(X1))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_32]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(truth)),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_22]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    implies(not(implies(implies(not(y),not(x)),not(x))),z) != implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    implies(not(X1),not(X2)) = implies(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_34]),c_0_8]),c_0_15]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_32]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    implies(not(implies(implies(x,y),not(x))),z) != implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = implies(not(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)),X4),implies(implies(X3,X1),X4)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),X3),implies(X1,X3)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    implies(not(z),implies(implies(x,y),not(x))) != implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    implies(X1,not(X2)) = implies(X2,not(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(X2,implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    implies(not(z),implies(x,not(implies(x,y)))) != implies(implies(x,y),implies(x,z)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)) = implies(X2,implies(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_45]),c_0_8]),c_0_45]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_37]),c_0_47])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : LCL152-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 12:32:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.deCQo1nu1f/E---3.1_673.p
% 3.69/0.94  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 3.69/0.94  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.69/0.94  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 760 completed with status 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 3.69/0.94  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.69/0.94  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # No SInE strategy applied
% 3.69/0.94  # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 3.69/0.94  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2U with 136s (1) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 765 completed with status 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 3.69/0.94  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.69/0.94  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # No SInE strategy applied
% 3.69/0.94  # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 3.69/0.94  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.69/0.94  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 3.69/0.94  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 3.69/0.94  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.69/0.94  
% 3.69/0.94  # Proof found!
% 3.69/0.94  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.69/0.94  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.69/0.94  # Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 3.69/0.94  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 3.69/0.94  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 3.69/0.94  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 3.69/0.94  # Processed clauses                    : 670
% 3.69/0.94  # ...of these trivial                  : 441
% 3.69/0.94  # ...subsumed                          : 28
% 3.69/0.94  # ...remaining for further processing  : 201
% 3.69/0.94  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Backward-rewritten                   : 79
% 3.69/0.94  # Generated clauses                    : 58046
% 3.69/0.94  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18412
% 3.69/0.94  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Paramodulations                      : 58046
% 3.69/0.94  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # NegExts                              : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Total rewrite steps                  : 101389
% 3.69/0.94  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.69/0.94  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.69/0.94  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.69/0.94  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.69/0.94  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.69/0.94  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.69/0.94  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.69/0.94  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.69/0.94  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.69/0.94  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.69/0.94  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.69/0.94  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.69/0.94  # Current number of processed clauses  : 115
% 3.69/0.94  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 109
% 3.69/0.94  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 3.69/0.94  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 3.69/0.94  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 3.69/0.94  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17613
% 3.69/0.94  # ...number of literals in the above   : 17613
% 3.69/0.94  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Current number of archived clauses   : 88
% 3.69/0.94  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 94
% 3.69/0.94  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2035
% 3.69/0.94  # BW rewrite match successes           : 465
% 3.69/0.94  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.69/0.94  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 654498
% 3.69/0.94  
% 3.69/0.94  # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.69/0.94  # User time                : 0.413 s
% 3.69/0.94  # System time              : 0.016 s
% 3.69/0.94  # Total time               : 0.429 s
% 3.69/0.94  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 3.69/0.94  
% 3.69/0.94  # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.69/0.94  # User time                : 2.085 s
% 3.69/0.94  # System time              : 0.090 s
% 3.69/0.94  # Total time               : 2.175 s
% 3.69/0.94  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 3.69/0.94  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------