TSTP Solution File: LCL146-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : LCL146-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:23:53 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   36 (  36 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (  35 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(wajsberg_2,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IwcTzX1A4D/E---3.1_26746.p',wajsberg_2) ).

cnf(wajsberg_1,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IwcTzX1A4D/E---3.1_26746.p',wajsberg_1) ).

cnf(wajsberg_3,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IwcTzX1A4D/E---3.1_26746.p',wajsberg_3) ).

cnf(wajsberg_4,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IwcTzX1A4D/E---3.1_26746.p',wajsberg_4) ).

cnf(big_hat_definition,axiom,
    big_hat(X1,X2) = not(big_V(not(X1),not(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IwcTzX1A4D/E---3.1_26746.p',big_hat_definition) ).

cnf(big_V_definition,axiom,
    big_V(X1,X2) = implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IwcTzX1A4D/E---3.1_26746.p',big_V_definition) ).

cnf(prove_wajsberg_theorem,negated_conjecture,
    not(big_hat(x,y)) != big_V(not(x),not(y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IwcTzX1A4D/E---3.1_26746.p',prove_wajsberg_theorem) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    wajsberg_2 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    wajsberg_1 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    wajsberg_3 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    implies(X1,X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    implies(X1,truth) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    wajsberg_4 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_13]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(truth)),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    implies(implies(not(truth),not(not(truth))),not(not(truth))) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_15]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    implies(not(truth),not(not(truth))) = not(not(truth)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    implies(not(truth),X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(implies(X2,X1))),implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    not(not(truth)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    implies(not(implies(X1,not(truth))),X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_8]),c_0_21]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(not(X1),not(truth))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_24]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    big_hat(X1,X2) = not(big_V(not(X1),not(X2))),
    big_hat_definition ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    big_V(X1,X2) = implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),
    big_V_definition ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    implies(not(X1),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_25]),c_0_8]),c_0_16]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    not(big_hat(x,y)) != big_V(not(x),not(y)),
    prove_wajsberg_theorem ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    big_hat(X1,X2) = not(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),not(X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(truth)),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_21]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    implies(X1,not(truth)) = not(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_28]),c_0_21]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    not(not(implies(implies(not(x),not(y)),not(y)))) != implies(implies(not(x),not(y)),not(y)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_27]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : LCL146-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 12:24:45 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IwcTzX1A4D/E---3.1_26746.p
% 0.21/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 26825 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2U with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y with pid 26835 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.21/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 62
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 20
% 0.21/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 42
% 0.21/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 0.21/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 649
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 258
% 0.21/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 649
% 0.21/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 946
% 0.21/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 18
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 204
% 0.21/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 204
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 23
% 0.21/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 50
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 15
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 62
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6572
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1664 pages
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.039 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------