TSTP Solution File: LCL139-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : LCL139-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:11:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  26 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (  25 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(wajsberg_2,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fLwu0m45Qr/E---3.1_9272.p',wajsberg_2) ).

cnf(wajsberg_1,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fLwu0m45Qr/E---3.1_9272.p',wajsberg_1) ).

cnf(wajsberg_3,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fLwu0m45Qr/E---3.1_9272.p',wajsberg_3) ).

cnf(wajsberg_4,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fLwu0m45Qr/E---3.1_9272.p',wajsberg_4) ).

cnf(prove_wajsberg_lemma,negated_conjecture,
    implies(x,not(truth)) != not(x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fLwu0m45Qr/E---3.1_9272.p',prove_wajsberg_lemma) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    wajsberg_2 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    wajsberg_1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    wajsberg_3 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = implies(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    implies(X1,X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    implies(X1,truth) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_12]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    wajsberg_4 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_13]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(truth)),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    implies(not(truth),X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    implies(not(X1),implies(X1,X2)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(truth)),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_17]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    implies(not(implies(X1,not(truth))),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(not(X1),not(truth))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_20]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    implies(not(X1),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_21]),c_0_6]),c_0_16]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    implies(x,not(truth)) != not(x),
    prove_wajsberg_lemma ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    implies(X1,not(truth)) = not(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_22]),c_0_17]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : LCL139-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 13:12:19 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fLwu0m45Qr/E---3.1_9272.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # sh5l with pid 9375 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.18/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/0.44  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.44  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with pid 9382 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.18/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/0.44  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.44  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.44  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.44  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.18/0.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Initial clauses                      : 5
% 0.18/0.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.18/0.44  # Processed clauses                    : 48
% 0.18/0.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 15
% 0.18/0.44  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.18/0.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 32
% 0.18/0.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 0.18/0.44  # Generated clauses                    : 473
% 0.18/0.44  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 176
% 0.18/0.44  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Paramodulations                      : 473
% 0.18/0.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Total rewrite steps                  : 580
% 0.18/0.44  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.44  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.44  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.44  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.44  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.44  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.44  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.44  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.44  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.44  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.44  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.44  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 17
% 0.18/0.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.18/0.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.18/0.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 133
% 0.18/0.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 133
% 0.18/0.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 0.18/0.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 51
% 0.18/0.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 11
% 0.18/0.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3978
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.44  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.44  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.44  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1420 pages
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.44  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.44  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.44  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.18/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------