TSTP Solution File: LCL134-1 by Toma---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Toma---0.4
% Problem  : LCL134-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : toma --casc %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:13:54 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem    : LCL134-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : toma --casc %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 19:51:02 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.65  original problem:
% 0.20/0.65  axioms:
% 0.20/0.65  implies(truth(), X) = X
% 0.20/0.65  implies(implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z))) = truth()
% 0.20/0.65  implies(implies(X, Y), Y) = implies(implies(Y, X), X)
% 0.20/0.65  implies(implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X)) = truth()
% 0.20/0.65  goal:
% 0.20/0.65  implies(x(), truth()) != truth()
% 0.20/0.65  To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 0.20/0.65  it suffices to show that implies(x(), truth()) = truth() (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 0.20/0.65  Here is an equational proof:
% 0.20/0.65  0: implies(truth(), X0) = X0.
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  1: implies(implies(X0, X1), implies(implies(X1, X2), implies(X0, X2))) = truth().
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  2: implies(implies(X0, X1), X1) = implies(implies(X1, X0), X0).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  4: implies(implies(X2, truth()), truth()) = implies(X2, X2).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: A critical pair between equations 2 and 0.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  8: truth() = implies(implies(X0, truth()), implies(X3, implies(X0, X3))).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: A critical pair between equations 1 and 0.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  9: truth() = implies(X3, implies(implies(X3, X2), implies(truth(), X2))).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: A critical pair between equations 1 and 0.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  10: truth() = implies(implies(implies(implies(X3, X5), X5), X3), truth()).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: A critical pair between equations 1 and 1.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  13: implies(implies(X3, implies(X2, X3)), implies(X2, X3)) = implies(implies(implies(X3, X2), X2), X3).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: A critical pair between equations 2 and 2.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  16: truth() = implies(implies(implies(X3, implies(X5, X3)), implies(X5, X3)), truth()).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: Rewrite equation 10,
% 0.20/0.65                 lhs with equations []
% 0.20/0.65                 rhs with equations [13].
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  17: truth() = implies(X3, implies(implies(X3, X2), X2)).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: Rewrite equation 9,
% 0.20/0.65                 lhs with equations []
% 0.20/0.65                 rhs with equations [0].
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  27: truth() = implies(implies(truth(), implies(implies(X7, X7), X7)), truth()).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: A critical pair between equations 16 and 17.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  28: truth() = implies(implies(truth(), implies(truth(), implies(X6, truth()))), truth()).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: A critical pair between equations 16 and 8.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  31: truth() = implies(X6, X6).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: Rewrite equation 28,
% 0.20/0.65                 lhs with equations []
% 0.20/0.65                 rhs with equations [0,0,4].
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  32: truth() = implies(X7, truth()).
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: Rewrite equation 27,
% 0.20/0.65                 lhs with equations []
% 0.20/0.65                 rhs with equations [31,0,0].
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  35: implies(x(), truth()) = truth().
% 0.20/0.65  Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations [32]
% 0.20/0.65                 rhs with equations [].
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------