TSTP Solution File: LCL134-1 by LEO-II---1.7.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LEO-II---1.7.0
% Problem  : LCL134-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : leo --timeout %d --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=./eprover %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:20:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  33 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  51 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  164 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 158   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0   ^  42   !;   0   ?;  42   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tp_implies,type,
    implies: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(tp_not,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

thf(tp_truth,type,
    truth: $i ).

thf(tp_x,type,
    x: $i ).

thf(1,axiom,
    ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
      ( ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ ( not @ Y ) ) @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) )
      = truth ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_4) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
      ( ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ Y )
      = ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) @ X ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_3) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [X: $i,Y: $i,Z: $i] :
      ( ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) )
      = truth ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_2) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [X: $i] :
      ( ( implies @ truth @ X )
      = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_1) ).

thf(5,conjecture,
    $false,
    file('no conjecture given, we try to refute the axioms',dummy_conjecture) ).

thf(6,negated_conjecture,
    $false = $false,
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[5]) ).

thf(7,negated_conjecture,
    ( implies @ x @ truth )
 != truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_wajsberg_lemma) ).

thf(8,plain,
    $false = $false,
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
          ( ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ ( not @ Y ) ) @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) )
          = truth ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
          ( ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ Y )
          = ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) @ X ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i,Y: $i,Z: $i] :
          ( ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) )
          = truth ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] :
          ( ( implies @ truth @ X )
          = X ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( ( ( implies @ x @ truth )
       != truth ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( ~ $false )
    = $true ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ( ( ( implies @ x @ truth )
       != truth ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_combined,[status(esa)],[13]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( ( ( implies @ x @ truth )
       != truth ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] :
          ( ( implies @ truth @ X )
          = X ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i,Y: $i,Z: $i] :
          ( ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) )
          = truth ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
          ( ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ Y )
          = ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) @ X ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
          ( ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ ( not @ Y ) ) @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) )
          = truth ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ( ( ~ $false )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ( ( implies @ x @ truth )
      = truth )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( implies @ truth @ SV1 )
        = SV1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ! [SY8: $i,SY9: $i] :
            ( ( implies @ ( implies @ SV2 @ SY8 ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ SY8 @ SY9 ) @ ( implies @ SV2 @ SY9 ) ) )
            = truth ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i] :
      ( ( ! [SY10: $i] :
            ( ( implies @ ( implies @ SV3 @ SY10 ) @ SY10 )
            = ( implies @ ( implies @ SY10 @ SV3 ) @ SV3 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [SV4: $i] :
      ( ( ! [SY11: $i] :
            ( ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ SV4 ) @ ( not @ SY11 ) ) @ ( implies @ SY11 @ SV4 ) )
            = truth ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    $false = $false,
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [SV5: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ! [SY12: $i] :
            ( ( implies @ ( implies @ SV2 @ SV5 ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ SV5 @ SY12 ) @ ( implies @ SV2 @ SY12 ) ) )
            = truth ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [SV6: $i,SV3: $i] :
      ( ( ( implies @ ( implies @ SV3 @ SV6 ) @ SV6 )
        = ( implies @ ( implies @ SV6 @ SV3 ) @ SV3 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [SV7: $i,SV4: $i] :
      ( ( ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ SV4 ) @ ( not @ SV7 ) ) @ ( implies @ SV7 @ SV4 ) )
        = truth )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [SV8: $i,SV5: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( implies @ ( implies @ SV2 @ SV5 ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ SV5 @ SV8 ) @ ( implies @ SV2 @ SV8 ) ) )
        = truth )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[22,31,30,29,27,23]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(solved_all_splits,[solved_all_splits(join,[])],[32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : LCL134-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : leo --timeout %d --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=./eprover %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 04:42:06 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37   No.of.Axioms: 5
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37   Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37   Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.14/0.37  (rf:0,axioms:5,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:600,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:7,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:0,translation:fof_full).
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  ********************************
% 0.21/0.41  *   All subproblems solved!    *
% 0.21/0.41  ********************************
% 0.21/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:5,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:74,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:32,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  %**** Beginning of derivation protocol ****
% 0.21/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  %**** End of derivation protocol ****
% 0.21/0.41  %**** no. of clauses in derivation: 33 ****
% 0.21/0.41  %**** clause counter: 32 ****
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:5,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:74,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:32,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------