TSTP Solution File: LCL134-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL134-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.14s 1.96s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  17 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   2   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (;  23   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ implies > #nlpp > not > x > truth

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(truth,type,
    truth: $i ).

tff(x,type,
    x: $i ).

tff(not,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(implies,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_47,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( implies(truth,X) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_49,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] : ( implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z))) = truth ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( implies(implies(X,Y),Y) = implies(implies(Y,X),X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_57,axiom,
    implies(x,truth) != truth,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ( implies(truth,X_1) = X_1 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_47]) ).

tff(c_91,plain,
    ! [X_15,Y_16,Z_17] : ( implies(implies(X_15,Y_16),implies(implies(Y_16,Z_17),implies(X_15,Z_17))) = truth ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_183,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_1] : ( implies(implies(truth,Y_16),implies(implies(Y_16,X_1),X_1)) = truth ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_91]) ).

tff(c_327,plain,
    ! [Y_20,X_21] : ( implies(Y_20,implies(implies(Y_20,X_21),X_21)) = truth ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_183]) ).

tff(c_358,plain,
    ! [X_21] : ( implies(implies(truth,X_21),X_21) = truth ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_327,c_2]) ).

tff(c_416,plain,
    ! [X_21] : ( implies(X_21,X_21) = truth ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_358]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ! [Y_13,X_14] : ( implies(implies(Y_13,X_14),X_14) = implies(implies(X_14,Y_13),Y_13) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_79,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ( implies(implies(X_1,truth),truth) = implies(X_1,X_1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_46]) ).

tff(c_480,plain,
    ! [X_23] : ( implies(implies(X_23,truth),truth) = truth ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_416,c_79]) ).

tff(c_193,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_1] : ( implies(Y_16,implies(implies(Y_16,X_1),X_1)) = truth ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_183]) ).

tff(c_490,plain,
    ! [X_23] : ( implies(X_23,truth) = truth ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_480,c_193]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    implies(x,truth) != truth,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_568,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_490,c_10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL134-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:57:31 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.14/1.96  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.14/1.96  
% 3.14/1.96  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.46/2.00  
% 3.46/2.00  Inference rules
% 3.46/2.00  ----------------------
% 3.46/2.00  #Ref     : 0
% 3.46/2.00  #Sup     : 148
% 3.46/2.00  #Fact    : 0
% 3.46/2.00  #Define  : 0
% 3.46/2.00  #Split   : 0
% 3.46/2.00  #Chain   : 0
% 3.46/2.00  #Close   : 0
% 3.46/2.00  
% 3.46/2.00  Ordering : KBO
% 3.46/2.00  
% 3.46/2.00  Simplification rules
% 3.46/2.00  ----------------------
% 3.46/2.00  #Subsume      : 1
% 3.46/2.00  #Demod        : 94
% 3.46/2.00  #Tautology    : 73
% 3.46/2.00  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.46/2.00  #BackRed      : 2
% 3.46/2.00  
% 3.46/2.00  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.46/2.00  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.46/2.00  
% 3.46/2.00  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.46/2.00  ----------------------
% 3.46/2.00  Preprocessing        : 0.43
% 3.46/2.00  Parsing              : 0.24
% 3.46/2.00  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.46/2.00  Main loop            : 0.37
% 3.46/2.00  Inferencing          : 0.14
% 3.46/2.00  Reduction            : 0.12
% 3.46/2.00  Demodulation         : 0.10
% 3.46/2.00  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.46/2.00  Subsumption          : 0.07
% 3.46/2.00  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.46/2.00  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.46/2.00  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.46/2.00  Total                : 0.85
% 3.46/2.00  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.46/2.00  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.46/2.00  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.46/2.00  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------