TSTP Solution File: LCL131-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LCL131-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:03:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.64s 2.82s
% Output   : Refutation 2.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  22 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   79 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | is_a_theorem(B) ),
    file('LCL131-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(a,e_quivalent(a,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(b,c),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(b,e),e_quivalent(c,e)))))),
    file('LCL131-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),e_quivalent(D,C)),e_quivalent(B,D))),A)),
    file('LCL131-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(C,B)),e_quivalent(A,C)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(D,E),e_quivalent(F,E)),e_quivalent(D,F)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[3,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,3,1,3')] ).

cnf(5,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(C,B)),e_quivalent(A,C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,1,3')] ).

cnf(6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(C,B)),D),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,C),D))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[5,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,5,1,3')] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(C,B)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,D),e_quivalent(C,D)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[5,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,5,1,4')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),C),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(D,B),C)),e_quivalent(A,D))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1,3')] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(A,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1,5')] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),e_quivalent(D,C))),e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,D)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1,3')] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,C),e_quivalent(B,C)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[10,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,10,1,6')] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),e_quivalent(D,C)),e_quivalent(B,D))),E),e_quivalent(A,E))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[7,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,7,1,3')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),C),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,D),e_quivalent(B,D)),C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,1,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,1,12')] ).

cnf(33,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(D,C)),e_quivalent(B,D)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[11,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,11,1,6')] ).

cnf(36,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(C,B)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(D,E),e_quivalent(F,E)),e_quivalent(D,F))),e_quivalent(A,C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[11,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,11,1,3')] ).

cnf(39,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(C,e_quivalent(B,D))),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,D),C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,1,11]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,1,11')] ).

cnf(113,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,B)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[33,1,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,33,1,9')] ).

cnf(126,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,e_quivalent(C,C))),e_quivalent(A,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[113,1,33]),
    [iquote('hyper,113,1,33')] ).

cnf(173,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(D,B)),e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(D,C)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[15,1,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,15,1,9')] ).

cnf(1935,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(C,B)),A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[173,1,126]),
    [iquote('hyper,173,1,126')] ).

cnf(1973,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),D)),e_quivalent(C,B)),D),A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[1935,1,39]),
    [iquote('hyper,1935,1,39')] ).

cnf(8462,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,D),e_quivalent(C,D)))))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[1973,1,36]),
    [iquote('hyper,1973,1,36')] ).

cnf(8463,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[8462,2]),
    [iquote('binary,8462.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : LCL131-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:19:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.64/2.82  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 2.64/2.82  The process was started by sandbox on n005.cluster.edu,
% 2.64/2.82  Wed Jul 27 09:19:35 2022
% 2.64/2.82  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 8870.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.64/2.82  set(auto).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 2.64/2.82  clear(print_given).
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  list(usable).
% 2.64/2.82  0 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(X,Y))| -is_a_theorem(X)|is_a_theorem(Y).
% 2.64/2.82  0 [] is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(X,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(Y,Z),e_quivalent(U,Z)),e_quivalent(Y,U))),X)).
% 2.64/2.82  0 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(a,e_quivalent(a,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(b,c),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(b,e),e_quivalent(c,e)))))).
% 2.64/2.82  end_of_list.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 2.64/2.82  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 2.64/2.82  in usable.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.64/2.82     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  ------------> process usable:
% 2.64/2.82  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 2.64/2.82  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 2 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(a,e_quivalent(a,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(b,c),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(b,e),e_quivalent(c,e)))))).
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  ------------> process sos:
% 2.64/2.82  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 3 [] is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),e_quivalent(D,C)),e_quivalent(B,D))),A)).
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  Resetting weight limit to 20.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  Resetting weight limit to 20.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  sos_size=6257
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.96 sec ----> 8463 [binary,8462.1,2.1] $F.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  Length of proof is 19.  Level of proof is 10.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.64/2.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.64/2.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.64/2.82  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  ============ end of search ============
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.64/2.82  clauses given                355
% 2.64/2.82  clauses generated          87913
% 2.64/2.82  clauses kept                8462
% 2.64/2.82  clauses forward subsumed   43850
% 2.64/2.82  clauses back subsumed          3
% 2.64/2.82  Kbytes malloced             5859
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.64/2.82  user CPU time          0.96          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.64/2.82  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.64/2.82  wall-clock time        3             (0 hr, 0 min, 3 sec)
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.64/2.82  
% 2.64/2.82  Process 8870 finished Wed Jul 27 09:19:38 2022
% 2.64/2.82  Otter interrupted
% 2.64/2.83  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------