TSTP Solution File: LCL130-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL130-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fabOImxrJj true
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:58:20 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.70s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LCL130-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fabOImxrJj true
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 04:54:48 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.34 % Running in FO mode
% 0.19/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.19/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.19/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.19/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.19/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.19/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.19/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.19/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.19/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.19/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.70/0.79 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.70/0.79 % BCE start: 3
% 0.70/0.79 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.70/0.79 % PE start: 3
% 0.70/0.79 logic: neq
% 0.70/0.79 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.70/0.79 % done 18 iterations in 0.037s
% 0.70/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.70/0.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.79 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(equivalent_type, type, equivalent: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(prove_lg_2, conjecture,
% 0.70/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 a @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 a @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @ b @ c ) @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ b @ e ) @ ( equivalent @ c @ e ) ) ) ) ))).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.70/0.79 (~( is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 a @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 a @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @ b @ c ) @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ b @ e ) @ ( equivalent @ c @ e ) ) ) ) ) )),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_lg_2])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ a @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ a @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ c) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ e) @ (equivalent @ c @ e))))))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(p_4, axiom,
% 0.70/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 X @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @ Y @ Z ) @
% 0.70/0.79 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ Y @ U ) @ ( equivalent @ Z @ U ) ) ) ) @
% 0.70/0.79 X ))).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3)))) @
% 0.70/0.79 X0))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p_4])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3)))) @
% 0.70/0.79 X0))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p_4])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3)))) @
% 0.70/0.79 X0))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p_4])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.70/0.79 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) ) ) |
% 0.70/0.79 ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.70/0.79 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.70/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1)))))
% 0.70/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X5 @ X4) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X5 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X3)))))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1)))))
% 0.70/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X5 @ X4) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X5 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X3))))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.70/0.79 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.70/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1))
% 0.70/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.70/0.79 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.70/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1))
% 0.70/0.79 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0))
% 0.70/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 ( (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X0))
% 0.70/0.79 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('eq_fact', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i]: (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X3) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3)))) @
% 0.70/0.79 X0))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p_4])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1))
% 0.70/0.79 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0))
% 0.70/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1)))) @
% 0.70/0.79 X4))
% 0.70/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X4)))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain,
% 0.70/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.70/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ X3 @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ X3 @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @
% 0.70/0.79 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))))),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.70/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl55, plain, ($false),
% 0.70/0.79 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl50])).
% 0.70/0.79
% 0.70/0.79 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.70/0.79
% 0.70/0.79
% 0.70/0.79 % Terminating...
% 1.61/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 1.61/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------