TSTP Solution File: LCL130-1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : LCL130-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:49:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  17 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   45 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  110 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ) ).

cnf(p_4,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))),X)) ).

cnf(prove_lg_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(a,equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,c),equivalent(equivalent(b,e),equivalent(c,e)))))) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))),X_33))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))),X_33),equivalent(X_34,X_33)))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_34,X_33)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[condensed_detachment:[bind(X,$fot(equivalent(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))),X_33))),bind(Y,$fot(equivalent(X_34,X_33)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_21,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))),X_21)),
    inference(subst,[],[p_4:[bind(X,$fot(X_21))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_17,X_18))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_17,X_18),equivalent(equivalent(X_17,X_16),equivalent(X_18,X_16))))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_17,X_16),equivalent(X_18,X_16))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[condensed_detachment:[bind(X,$fot(equivalent(X_17,X_18))),bind(Y,$fot(equivalent(equivalent(X_17,X_16),equivalent(X_18,X_16))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_3,equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_5),equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_2),equivalent(X_5,X_2)))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_3,equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_5),equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_2),equivalent(X_5,X_2)))),X_3))
    | is_a_theorem(X_3) ),
    inference(subst,[],[condensed_detachment:[bind(X,$fot(equivalent(X_3,equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_5),equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_2),equivalent(X_5,X_2)))))),bind(Y,$fot(X_3))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_3,equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_5),equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_2),equivalent(X_5,X_2)))),X_3)),
    inference(subst,[],[p_4:[bind(U,$fot(X_2)),bind(X,$fot(X_3)),bind(Y,$fot(X_4)),bind(Z,$fot(X_5))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_3,equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_5),equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_2),equivalent(X_5,X_2)))))
    | is_a_theorem(X_3) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_3,equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_5),equivalent(equivalent(X_4,X_2),equivalent(X_5,X_2)))),X_3)) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_15),equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_13),equivalent(X_15,X_13))),equivalent(equivalent(X_11,X_12),equivalent(equivalent(X_11,X_10),equivalent(X_12,X_10)))))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_15),equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_13),equivalent(X_15,X_13)))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(X_2,$fot(X_10)),bind(X_3,$fot(equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_15),equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_13),equivalent(X_15,X_13))))),bind(X_4,$fot(X_11)),bind(X_5,$fot(X_12))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_9),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_6),equivalent(X_9,X_6))),equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_9),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_6),equivalent(X_9,X_6))))),
    inference(subst,[],[p_4:[bind(X,$fot(equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_9),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_6),equivalent(X_9,X_6)))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_9),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_6),equivalent(X_9,X_6))),equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_9),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_6),equivalent(X_9,X_6)))))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_9),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_6),equivalent(X_9,X_6))),equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U))))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(X_2,$fot(X_6)),bind(X_3,$fot(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_9),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_6),equivalent(X_9,X_6))),equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))))),bind(X_4,$fot(X_8)),bind(X_5,$fot(X_9))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_9),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_6),equivalent(X_9,X_6))),equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U))))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_9),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_6),equivalent(X_9,X_6))),equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_9),equivalent(equivalent(X_8,X_6),equivalent(X_9,X_6))))) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_15),equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_13),equivalent(X_15,X_13))),equivalent(equivalent(X_11,X_12),equivalent(equivalent(X_11,X_10),equivalent(X_12,X_10))))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(U,$fot(X_10)),bind(Y,$fot(X_11)),bind(Z,$fot(X_12)),bind(X_6,$fot(X_13)),bind(X_8,$fot(X_14)),bind(X_9,$fot(X_15))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_15),equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_13),equivalent(X_15,X_13)))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_15),equivalent(equivalent(X_14,X_13),equivalent(X_15,X_13))),equivalent(equivalent(X_11,X_12),equivalent(equivalent(X_11,X_10),equivalent(X_12,X_10))))) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_17,X_18),equivalent(equivalent(X_17,X_16),equivalent(X_18,X_16)))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(X_13,$fot(X_16)),bind(X_14,$fot(X_17)),bind(X_15,$fot(X_18))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_17,X_18))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_17,X_16),equivalent(X_18,X_16))) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_17,X_18),equivalent(equivalent(X_17,X_16),equivalent(X_18,X_16)))) )],[refute_0_12,refute_0_2]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_21,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))),X_21))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_21,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))),X_19),equivalent(X_21,X_19))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_13:[bind(X_16,$fot(X_19)),bind(X_17,$fot(equivalent(X_21,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))))),bind(X_18,$fot(X_21))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_21,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))),X_19),equivalent(X_21,X_19))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_21,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))),X_21)) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))),X_33),equivalent(X_34,X_33))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_15:[bind(U,$fot(X_30)),bind(Y,$fot(X_31)),bind(Z,$fot(X_32)),bind(X_19,$fot(X_33)),bind(X_21,$fot(X_34))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))),X_33))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_34,X_33)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))),X_33),equivalent(X_34,X_33))) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))),equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30))))))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_17:[bind(X_33,$fot(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30))))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_260,equivalent(equivalent(X_258,X_259),equivalent(equivalent(X_258,X_257),equivalent(X_259,X_257)))),X_260)),
    inference(subst,[],[p_4:[bind(U,$fot(X_257)),bind(X,$fot(X_260)),bind(Y,$fot(X_258)),bind(Z,$fot(X_259))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_260,equivalent(equivalent(X_258,X_259),equivalent(equivalent(X_258,X_257),equivalent(X_259,X_257)))),X_260))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_260,X_260)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_17:[bind(X_30,$fot(X_257)),bind(X_31,$fot(X_258)),bind(X_32,$fot(X_259)),bind(X_33,$fot(X_260)),bind(X_34,$fot(X_260))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_260,X_260)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_260,equivalent(equivalent(X_258,X_259),equivalent(equivalent(X_258,X_257),equivalent(X_259,X_257)))),X_260)) )],[refute_0_19,refute_0_20]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))),equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_21:[bind(X_260,$fot(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30))))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))),equivalent(X_34,equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_32),equivalent(equivalent(X_31,X_30),equivalent(X_32,X_30)))))) )],[refute_0_22,refute_0_18]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(a,equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,c),equivalent(equivalent(b,e),equivalent(c,e)))))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_23:[bind(X_30,$fot(e)),bind(X_31,$fot(b)),bind(X_32,$fot(c)),bind(X_34,$fot(a))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(a,equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,c),equivalent(equivalent(b,e),equivalent(c,e)))))) )],[refute_0_24,prove_lg_2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LCL130-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 04:18:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.18/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------