TSTP Solution File: LCL130-1 by Drodi---3.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Drodi---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL130-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : drodi -learnfrom(drodi.lrn) -timeout(%d) %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 31 12:18:22 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 14 ~; 12 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 45 (; 45 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X,Y] :
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X)
| is_a_theorem(Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X,Y,Z,U] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Y,U),equivalent(Z,U)))),X)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).
fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(a,equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,c),equivalent(equivalent(b,e),equivalent(c,e)))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).
fof(f4,plain,
! [Y] :
( ! [X] :
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X) )
| is_a_theorem(Y) ),
inference(miniscoping,[status(esa)],[f1]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f4]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X1,X3),equivalent(X2,X3)))),X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f2]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(a,equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,c),equivalent(equivalent(b,e),equivalent(c,e)))))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f3]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X1,X3),equivalent(X2,X3)))))
| is_a_theorem(X0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f6,f5]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X0,X2),equivalent(X1,X2))),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X4),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X5),equivalent(X4,X5))))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f8,f6]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X0,X2),equivalent(X1,X2)))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f9,f8]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X2),equivalent(X1,X2))) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f10,f5]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X2))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f21,f5]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X1,X3),equivalent(X2,X3)))),X4))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X4,X0)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f23,f6]) ).
fof(f77,plain,
! [X0] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X0)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f25,f6]) ).
fof(f90,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X0)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f77,f23]) ).
fof(f93,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X1,X3),equivalent(X2,X3)))))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f90,f6]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f7,f93]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.09 % Problem : LCL130-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.05/0.10 % Command : drodi -learnfrom(drodi.lrn) -timeout(%d) %s
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Tue May 30 09:41:40 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.30 % Drodi V3.5.1
% 0.15/0.54 % Refutation found
% 0.15/0.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark: Theory is unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.54 % Elapsed time: 0.022562 seconds
% 0.15/0.54 % CPU time: 0.031056 seconds
% 0.15/0.54 % Memory used: 4.087 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------