TSTP Solution File: LCL126-1 by Faust---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Faust---1.0
% Problem  : LCL126-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : faust %s

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed May  6 13:43:11 EDT 2009

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.1s
% Output   : Refutation 0.1s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  14   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   1 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Faust---1.0 format not known, defaulting to TPTP
fof(q_4,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(B,C)))),
    file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL126-1.tptp',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(141583008,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(B,C)))),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[q_4]),
    [] ).

fof(condensed_detachment,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
      | is_a_theorem(B) ),
    file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL126-1.tptp',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(141573904,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | is_a_theorem(B) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]),
    [] ).

cnf(149582632,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(B,C))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[141573904,141583008]),
    [] ).

cnf(149677408,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,C))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(B,C)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[149582632,141573904]),
    [] ).

fof(q_3,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(B,C)),equivalent(C,B)))),
    file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL126-1.tptp',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(141578760,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(B,C)),equivalent(C,B)))),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[q_3]),
    [] ).

cnf(149357928,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(B,C)),equivalent(C,B))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[141573904,141578760]),
    [] ).

cnf(150430392,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(C,B),equivalent(C,B)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[149677408,149357928]),
    [] ).

cnf(150619184,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(B,A),equivalent(B,A))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[150430392,141578760]),
    [] ).

cnf(149615048,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(B,C)))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(C,B)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[149357928,141573904]),
    [] ).

cnf(150712200,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(B,A))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[150619184,149615048]),
    [] ).

fof(prove_q_2,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(c,b)),equivalent(a,c))),
    file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL126-1.tptp',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(141586752,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(c,b)),equivalent(a,c))),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[prove_q_2]),
    [] ).

cnf(contradiction,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution__resolution,[status(thm)],[141583008,150712200,141586752]),
    [] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Proof found in: 0 seconds
% START OF PROOF SEQUENCE
% fof(q_4,plain,(is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(B,C))))),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL126-1.tptp',unknown),[]).
% 
% cnf(141583008,plain,(is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(B,C))))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[q_4]),[]).
% 
% fof(condensed_detachment,plain,(~is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B))|~is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B)),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL126-1.tptp',unknown),[]).
% 
% cnf(141573904,plain,(~is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B))|~is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B)),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]),[]).
% 
% cnf(149582632,plain,(~is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B))|is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,C),equivalent(B,C)))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[141573904,141583008]),[]).
% 
% cnf(149677408,plain,(~is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B))|~is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,C))|is_a_theorem(equivalent(B,C))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[149582632,141573904]),[]).
% 
% fof(q_3,plain,(is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(B,C)),equivalent(C,B))))),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL126-1.tptp',unknown),[]).
% 
% cnf(141578760,plain,(is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(B,C)),equivalent(C,B))))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[q_3]),[]).
% 
% cnf(149357928,plain,(~is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(B,C)),equivalent(C,B)))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[141573904,141578760]),[]).
% 
% cnf(150430392,plain,(is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(C,B),equivalent(C,B)))|~is_a_theorem(A)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[149677408,149357928]),[]).
% 
% cnf(150619184,plain,(is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(B,A),equivalent(B,A)))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[150430392,141578760]),[]).
% 
% cnf(149615048,plain,(~is_a_theorem(A)|~is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,equivalent(B,C)))|is_a_theorem(equivalent(C,B))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[149357928,141573904]),[]).
% 
% cnf(150712200,plain,(~is_a_theorem(equivalent(B,A))|is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[150619184,149615048]),[]).
% 
% fof(prove_q_2,plain,(~is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(c,b)),equivalent(a,c)))),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL126-1.tptp',unknown),[]).
% 
% cnf(141586752,plain,(~is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(c,b)),equivalent(a,c)))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[prove_q_2]),[]).
% 
% cnf(contradiction,plain,$false,inference(forward_subsumption_resolution__resolution,[status(thm)],[141583008,150712200,141586752]),[]).
% 
% END OF PROOF SEQUENCE
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------