TSTP Solution File: LCL118-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LCL118-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:20:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.72s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(wo,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,Z)),equivalent(Z,equivalent(Y,X)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wo) ).

cnf(prove_yqm,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(equivalent(c,b),equivalent(c,a)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_yqm) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(Z,equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,wo,wo]) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(c,a),equivalent(equivalent(c,b),equivalent(a,b)))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,prove_yqm,wo]) ).

cnf(8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(Z,U)),equivalent(equivalent(U,equivalent(Z,Y)),X)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,4,wo]) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,Z)),U),equivalent(equivalent(Z,equivalent(Y,X)),U))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,8,wo]) ).

cnf(29,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,Z)),equivalent(U,equivalent(equivalent(Y,X),equivalent(Z,U))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,12,4]) ).

cnf(72,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(Z,U)),equivalent(U,equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,29,wo]) ).

cnf(524,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,72,wo,5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL118-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 05:54:38 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T05:54:39
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-07-03T05:54:39
% 0.54/0.72  
% 0.54/0.72  
% 0.54/0.72  #||
% 0.54/0.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/0.72  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.72  ||#
% 0.54/0.72  
% 0.54/0.72  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.54/0.72  ;      1899 formulas have been input or derived (from 39 formulas).
% 0.54/0.72  ;       524 (28%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.54/0.72  ;           35 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.54/0.72  ;          489 (93%) are still being kept.
% 0.54/0.72  ; 
% 0.54/0.72  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.54/0.72  ;     0.001   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.54/0.72  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (3 calls)
% 0.54/0.72  ;     0.064  26%   Process new row              (1,595 calls)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.076  30%   Resolution                   (76 calls)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.009   4%   Paramodulation               (38 calls)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (1 call)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (1 call)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (1 call)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.026  10%   Forward simplification       (1,584 calls)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.044  18%   Backward simplification      (524 calls)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.030  12%   Other
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.250        Total
% 0.54/0.73  ;     0.253        Real time
% 0.54/0.73  ; 
% 0.54/0.73  ; Term-hash-array has 1,771 terms in all.
% 0.54/0.73  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 entry (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.54/0.73  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 nodes (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.54/0.73  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1 call.
% 0.54/0.73  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1 call.
% 0.54/0.73  ; Path-index has 1,662 entries (1,662 at peak, 1,776 added, 114 deleted).
% 0.54/0.73  ; Path-index has 687 nodes (687 at peak, 687 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.54/0.73  ; Trie-index has 1,662 entries (1,662 at peak, 1,776 added, 114 deleted).
% 0.54/0.73  ; Trie-index has 4,289 nodes (4,289 at peak, 4,486 added, 197 deleted).
% 0.54/0.73  ; Retrieved 10,719 generalization terms in 1,591 calls.
% 0.54/0.73  ; Retrieved 7,961 instance terms in 522 calls.
% 0.54/0.73  ; Retrieved 53,028 unifiable terms in 1,418 calls.
% 0.54/0.73  ; 
% 0.54/0.73  ; The agenda of rows to process has 108 entries:
% 0.54/0.73  ;     1 with value 15             20 with value 27               1 with value 34
% 0.54/0.73  ;     1 with value 20              8 with value 28               4 with value 35
% 0.54/0.73  ;     6 with value 21              4 with value 29               4 with value 37
% 0.54/0.73  ;     8 with value 22              4 with value 30               1 with value 38
% 0.54/0.73  ;     1 with value 24              1 with value 31               2 with value 40
% 0.54/0.73  ;     8 with value 25             12 with value 32               6 with value 41
% 0.54/0.73  ;    12 with value 26              4 with value 33
% 0.54/0.73  ; The agenda of rows to give has 454 entries:
% 0.54/0.73  ;    11 with value (4 26)         35 with value (4 32)          33 with value (4 38)
% 0.54/0.73  ;     8 with value (4 27)         28 with value (4 33)          39 with value (4 39)
% 0.54/0.73  ;    19 with value (4 28)         35 with value (4 34)          20 with value (4 40)
% 0.54/0.73  ;    25 with value (4 29)         31 with value (4 35)           4 with value (4 41)
% 0.54/0.73  ;    45 with value (4 30)         29 with value (4 36)           3 with value (4 42)
% 0.54/0.73  ;    59 with value (4 31)         30 with value (4 37)
% 0.54/0.73  Evaluation took:
% 0.54/0.73    0.254 seconds of real time
% 0.54/0.73    0.235059 seconds of user run time
% 0.54/0.73    0.016868 seconds of system run time
% 0.54/0.73    [Run times include 0.011 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.54/0.73    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.54/0.73    0 page faults and
% 0.54/0.73    14,047,752 bytes consed.
% 0.54/0.73  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.54/0.73  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T05:54:39
% 0.54/0.73  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.54/0.73  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------