TSTP Solution File: LCL118-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LCL118-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:03:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.00s 2.21s
% Output   : Refutation 2.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  17 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | is_a_theorem(B) ),
    file('LCL118-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,b),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(c,b),e_quivalent(c,a)))),
    file('LCL118-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(C,e_quivalent(B,A)))),
    file('LCL118-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(C,e_quivalent(B,e_quivalent(A,C))))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[3,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,3,1,3')] ).

cnf(5,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,e_quivalent(C,e_quivalent(D,B))),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(D,C),A)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,1,4')] ).

cnf(6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,e_quivalent(C,D)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(D,e_quivalent(C,B)),A)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,1,3')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),C),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(D,e_quivalent(B,e_quivalent(A,D))),C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[5,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,5,1,3')] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)),D),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(C,e_quivalent(B,A)),D))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1,3')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(C,e_quivalent(B,A)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(D,E),e_quivalent(F,e_quivalent(E,e_quivalent(D,F))))))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1,4')] ).

cnf(25,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,e_quivalent(C,A))),e_quivalent(D,e_quivalent(B,e_quivalent(C,D))))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[9,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,9,1,4')] ).

cnf(46,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[15,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,15,1,3')] ).

cnf(51,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(C,e_quivalent(C,e_quivalent(A,B))))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[46,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,46,1,3')] ).

cnf(75,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,e_quivalent(B,A)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[25,1,51]),
    [iquote('hyper,25,1,51')] ).

cnf(99,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(A,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[75,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,75,1,3')] ).

cnf(102,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,e_quivalent(C,A))),e_quivalent(C,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[99,1,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,99,1,9')] ).

cnf(902,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,C),e_quivalent(B,C)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,1,102]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,1,102')] ).

cnf(2152,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(C,B),e_quivalent(C,A)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[902,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,902,1,3')] ).

cnf(2153,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[2152,2]),
    [iquote('binary,2152.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : LCL118-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:29:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.00/2.21  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 2.00/2.21  The process was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 2.00/2.21  Wed Jul 27 09:29:27 2022
% 2.00/2.21  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 29891.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.00/2.21  set(auto).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 2.00/2.21  clear(print_given).
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  list(usable).
% 2.00/2.21  0 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(X,Y))| -is_a_theorem(X)|is_a_theorem(Y).
% 2.00/2.21  0 [] is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(X,e_quivalent(Y,Z)),e_quivalent(Z,e_quivalent(Y,X)))).
% 2.00/2.21  0 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,b),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(c,b),e_quivalent(c,a)))).
% 2.00/2.21  end_of_list.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 2.00/2.21  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 2.00/2.21  in usable.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ------------> process usable:
% 2.00/2.21  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 2.00/2.21  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 2 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,b),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(c,b),e_quivalent(c,a)))).
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ------------> process sos:
% 2.00/2.21  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 3 [] is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(C,e_quivalent(B,A)))).
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.11 sec ----> 2153 [binary,2152.1,2.1] $F.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  Length of proof is 14.  Level of proof is 10.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.00/2.21  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.00/2.21  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.00/2.21  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ============ end of search ============
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.00/2.21  clauses given                 70
% 2.00/2.21  clauses generated           3416
% 2.00/2.21  clauses kept                2152
% 2.00/2.21  clauses forward subsumed    1267
% 2.00/2.21  clauses back subsumed         48
% 2.00/2.21  Kbytes malloced             1953
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.00/2.21  user CPU time          0.11          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.00/2.21  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.00/2.21  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  Process 29891 finished Wed Jul 27 09:29:28 2022
% 2.00/2.21  Otter interrupted
% 2.00/2.21  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------