TSTP Solution File: LCL117-1 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : LCL117-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:58:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.16s 2.23s
% Output : Proof 2.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL117-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 23:36:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.16/2.23 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.16/2.23 % SZS output start Proof
% 2.16/2.23 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 2.16/2.23
% 2.16/2.23 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 2.16/2.23
% 2.16/2.23 is_a_theorem(equivalent(X, Y)) & is_a_theorem(X) ==> is_a_theorem(Y)
% 2.16/2.23 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X, Y), equivalent(equivalent(Z, Y), equivalent(Z, X))))
% 2.16/2.23 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a, b), equivalent(a, c)), equivalent(c, b))) ==> \bottom
% 2.16/2.23
% 2.16/2.23 This holds because
% 2.16/2.23
% 2.16/2.23 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 2.16/2.23
% 2.16/2.23 E:
% 2.16/2.23 f1(true__, Y) = is_a_theorem(Y)
% 2.16/2.23 f2(is_a_theorem(X), X, Y) = true__
% 2.16/2.23 f2(true__, X, Y) = f1(is_a_theorem(equivalent(X, Y)), Y)
% 2.16/2.23 f3(is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a, b), equivalent(a, c)), equivalent(c, b)))) = true__
% 2.16/2.23 f3(true__) = false__
% 2.16/2.23 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X, Y), equivalent(equivalent(Z, Y), equivalent(Z, X)))) = true__
% 2.16/2.23 G:
% 2.16/2.23 true__ = false__
% 2.16/2.23
% 2.16/2.23 This holds because
% 2.16/2.23
% 2.16/2.23 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 2.16/2.23
% 2.16/2.23
% 2.16/2.23 f1(f1(true__, equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0, X1), equivalent(X0, X1)), Y1)), Y1) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f1(f1(true__, equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0, X1), equivalent(equivalent(X2, X1), equivalent(X2, X0))), Y1)), Y1) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f1(f1(true__, equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0, X1), equivalent(X0, X2)), equivalent(X2, X1)), Y1)), Y1) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f1(true__, equivalent(Y1, Y1)) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f1(true__, equivalent(equivalent(X2, equivalent(equivalent(Y2, Y1), equivalent(Y2, Y0))), equivalent(X2, equivalent(Y0, Y1)))) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f1(true__, equivalent(equivalent(Y0, Y1), equivalent(Y0, Y1))) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f1(true__, equivalent(equivalent(Y0, Y1), equivalent(equivalent(Y2, Y1), equivalent(Y2, Y0)))) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f1(true__, equivalent(equivalent(Y2, equivalent(Y2, Y1)), Y1)) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f1(true__, equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1, X2), equivalent(X1, X3)), equivalent(X3, X2))) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f2(f1(true__, Y0), Y0, Y1) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f2(true__, X, Y) -> f1(f1(true__, equivalent(X, Y)), Y)
% 2.16/2.23 f3(f1(true__, equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a, b), equivalent(a, c)), equivalent(c, b)))) -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 f3(true__) -> false__
% 2.16/2.23 false__ -> true__
% 2.16/2.23 is_a_theorem(Y) -> f1(true__, Y)
% 2.16/2.23 with the LPO induced by
% 2.16/2.23 c > b > a > f2 > equivalent > is_a_theorem > f1 > f3 > false__ > true__
% 2.16/2.23
% 2.16/2.23 % SZS output end Proof
% 2.16/2.23
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------