TSTP Solution File: LCL116-1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : LCL116-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:19:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 86.60s 86.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 86.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : LCL116-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 21:44:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I
% 0.13/0.36  # and selection function SelectCQArEqLast.
% 0.13/0.36  #
% 0.13/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.36  # Number of axioms: 6 Number of unprocessed: 6
% 0.13/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 3.16/3.34  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 3.16/3.34  # Local unification is enabled...
% 3.16/3.34  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 3.16/3.34  # 6 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 3.16/3.34  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 3.16/3.34  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 3.16/3.34  # Found 5 unit axioms.
% 3.16/3.34  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 3.16/3.34  # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 3.16/3.34  # 5 unit axiom clauses
% 3.16/3.34  
% 3.16/3.34  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 3.16/3.34  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 11.38/11.56  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 86.60/86.82  # There were 21 total branch saturation attempts.
% 86.60/86.82  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 86.60/86.82  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 86.60/86.82  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 86.60/86.82  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 86.60/86.82  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 86.60/86.82  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 86.60/86.82  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 86.60/86.82  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 86.60/86.82  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 86.60/86.82  # Begin clausification derivation
% 86.60/86.82  
% 86.60/86.82  # End clausification derivation
% 86.60/86.82  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))))).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))))).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))))).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),implies(implies(X2,X1),X1))))).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a))))))).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (is_a_theorem(X1)|~is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))|~is_a_theorem(X2))).
% 86.60/86.82  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 86.60/86.82  # Begin printing tableau
% 86.60/86.82  # Found 8 steps
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))),implies(implies(implies(b,not(implies(b,a))),implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a))))),implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))))))), inference(start_rule)).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_1414482, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))),implies(implies(implies(b,not(implies(b,a))),implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a))))),implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_10877036, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(b,not(implies(b,a))),implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a))))),implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a))))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_12244386, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_12244388, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(b,not(implies(b,a))),implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a))))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_10877038, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_13827255, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(b,not(implies(b,a))),implies(implies(implies(not(a),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))),implies(b,not(implies(b,a)))),implies(b,not(implies(b,a))))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 86.60/86.82  cnf(i_0_13827256, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(b,not(implies(b,a))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_13827256, ...])).
% 86.60/86.82  # End printing tableau
% 86.60/86.82  # SZS output end
% 86.60/86.82  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 86.60/86.82  # Returning from population with 3 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 86.60/86.82  # We now have 3 tableaux to operate on
% 86.60/86.82  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 86.60/86.82  # Proof search is over...
% 86.60/86.82  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------