TSTP Solution File: LCL115-1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : LCL115-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:17:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.59s 0.82s
% Output   : Proof 3.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : LCL115-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 17:36:02 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.59/0.82  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 3.59/0.82  
% 3.59/0.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.59/0.82  
% 3.59/0.84  % SZS output start Proof
% 3.59/0.84  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 3.59/0.84    fof(condensed_detachment, axiom, ![X, Y]: (~is_a_theorem(implies(X, Y)) | (~is_a_theorem(X) | is_a_theorem(Y)))).
% 3.59/0.84    fof(mv_1, axiom, ![X2, Y2]: is_a_theorem(implies(X2, implies(Y2, X2)))).
% 3.59/0.84    fof(mv_2, axiom, ![Z, X2, Y2]: is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2, Y2), implies(implies(Y2, Z), implies(X2, Z))))).
% 3.59/0.84    fof(mv_3, axiom, ![X2, Y2]: is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X2, Y2), Y2), implies(implies(Y2, X2), X2)))).
% 3.59/0.84    fof(mv_5, axiom, ![X2, Y2]: is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X2), not(Y2)), implies(Y2, X2)))).
% 3.59/0.84    fof(prove_mv_39, negated_conjecture, ~is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))).
% 3.59/0.84  
% 3.59/0.84  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 3.59/0.84  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 3.59/0.84  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 3.59/0.84    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 3.59/0.84    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 3.59/0.84  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 3.59/0.84  variables of u and v.
% 3.59/0.84  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 3.59/0.84  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 3.59/0.84  
% 3.59/0.84  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 3.59/0.84  
% 3.59/0.84  Axiom 1 (condensed_detachment): fresh2(X, X, Y) = true.
% 3.59/0.84  Axiom 2 (condensed_detachment): fresh(X, X, Y, Z) = is_a_theorem(Z).
% 3.59/0.84  Axiom 3 (mv_1): is_a_theorem(implies(X, implies(Y, X))) = true.
% 3.59/0.84  Axiom 4 (condensed_detachment): fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(X, Y)), true, X, Y) = fresh2(is_a_theorem(X), true, Y).
% 3.59/0.84  Axiom 5 (mv_5): is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X))) = true.
% 3.59/0.84  Axiom 6 (mv_2): is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z)))) = true.
% 3.59/0.85  Axiom 7 (mv_3): is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Y), implies(implies(Y, X), X))) = true.
% 3.59/0.85  
% 3.59/0.85  Lemma 8: fresh2(is_a_theorem(X), true, implies(Y, X)) = is_a_theorem(implies(Y, X)).
% 3.59/0.85  Proof:
% 3.59/0.85    fresh2(is_a_theorem(X), true, implies(Y, X))
% 3.59/0.85  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.59/0.85    fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(X, implies(Y, X))), true, X, implies(Y, X))
% 3.59/0.85  = { by axiom 3 (mv_1) }
% 3.59/0.85    fresh(true, true, X, implies(Y, X))
% 3.59/0.85  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.59/0.85    is_a_theorem(implies(Y, X))
% 3.59/0.85  
% 3.59/0.85  Lemma 9: fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X, Y), Y)), true, implies(implies(Y, X), X)) = is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Y, X), X)).
% 3.59/0.85  Proof:
% 3.59/0.85    fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X, Y), Y)), true, implies(implies(Y, X), X))
% 3.59/0.85  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.59/0.85    fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Y), implies(implies(Y, X), X))), true, implies(implies(X, Y), Y), implies(implies(Y, X), X))
% 3.59/0.85  = { by axiom 7 (mv_3) }
% 3.59/0.85    fresh(true, true, implies(implies(X, Y), Y), implies(implies(Y, X), X))
% 3.59/0.85  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.59/0.85    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Y, X), X))
% 3.59/0.85  
% 3.59/0.85  Lemma 10: is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), Z), Z)) = true.
% 3.59/0.85  Proof:
% 3.59/0.85    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), Z), Z))
% 3.59/0.85  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 3.59/0.85    fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Z, implies(X, implies(Y, X))), implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), true, implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), Z), Z))
% 3.59/0.85  = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 3.59/0.85    fresh2(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(X, implies(Y, X))), true, implies(implies(Z, implies(X, implies(Y, X))), implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), true, implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), Z), Z))
% 3.59/0.85  = { by axiom 3 (mv_1) }
% 3.59/0.85    fresh2(fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(Z, implies(X, implies(Y, X))), implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), true, implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), Z), Z))
% 3.59/0.85  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), Z), Z))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.85    true
% 3.85/0.85  
% 3.85/0.85  Lemma 11: fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(X, Y)), true, implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z))) = is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z))).
% 3.85/0.85  Proof:
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(X, Y)), true, implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z)))), true, implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 6 (mv_2) }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh(true, true, implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.85    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z)))
% 3.85/0.85  
% 3.85/0.85  Lemma 12: fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X, Y), Z)), true, implies(Y, Z)) = is_a_theorem(implies(Y, Z)).
% 3.85/0.85  Proof:
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X, Y), Z)), true, implies(Y, Z))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))), true, implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh(fresh(true, true, implies(implies(Y, implies(X, Y)), implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))), implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))), true, implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh(fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(Y, implies(X, Y)), implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))), implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z)))), true, implies(implies(Y, implies(X, Y)), implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))), implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))), true, implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Y, implies(X, Y)), implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z)))), true, implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))), true, implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 6 (mv_2) }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh(fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))), true, implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh(true, true, implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(Y, Z))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.85    is_a_theorem(implies(Y, Z))
% 3.85/0.85  
% 3.85/0.85  Lemma 13: is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(not(X), Z))) = true.
% 3.85/0.85  Proof:
% 3.85/0.85    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(not(X), Z)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(not(X), implies(X, Y))), true, implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(not(X), Z)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(Y), not(X)), implies(X, Y))), true, implies(not(X), implies(X, Y))), true, implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(not(X), Z)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 5 (mv_5) }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(fresh2(true, true, implies(not(X), implies(X, Y))), true, implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(not(X), Z)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(implies(X, Y), Z), implies(not(X), Z)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.85    true
% 3.85/0.85  
% 3.85/0.85  Lemma 14: fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(not(X), not(Y))), true, implies(Y, X)) = is_a_theorem(implies(Y, X)).
% 3.85/0.85  Proof:
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(not(X), not(Y))), true, implies(Y, X))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X))), true, implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 5 (mv_5) }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh(true, true, implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.85    is_a_theorem(implies(Y, X))
% 3.85/0.85  
% 3.85/0.85  Goal 1 (prove_mv_39): is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b))) = true.
% 3.85/0.85  Proof:
% 3.85/0.85    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by lemma 14 R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(fresh(true, true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(true, true, implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(a, b))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(a, b))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 3.85/0.85    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(a, b))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(a, b))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.85  = { by axiom 5 (mv_5) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(a, b))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(a, b))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(true, true, implies(implies(implies(X, implies(Y, X)), not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(a, b))), implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by lemma 13 }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(true, true, implies(implies(not(not(implies(a, b))), not(implies(X, implies(Y, X)))), not(implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(not(implies(a, b)))), not(implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by lemma 14 }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 7 (mv_3) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh(fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))))), true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(fresh(true, true, implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 2 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(true, true, implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) R->L }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b)), implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b))), implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 5 (mv_5) R->L }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(fresh2(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b))), true, implies(implies(implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b)), implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b))), implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by lemma 8 }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b)), implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b))), implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by lemma 9 }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b)))), true, implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 4 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(b), not(a)), implies(a, b)), implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b)))), true, implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by lemma 13 }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(true, true, implies(not(not(b)), implies(a, b))), true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(fresh2(true, true, implies(implies(implies(a, b), not(not(implies(a, b)))), implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b)))))), true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(fresh2(true, true, implies(not(not(b)), not(not(implies(a, b))))), true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    fresh2(true, true, implies(not(implies(a, b)), not(b)))
% 3.85/0.86  = { by axiom 1 (condensed_detachment) }
% 3.85/0.86    true
% 3.85/0.86  % SZS output end Proof
% 3.85/0.86  
% 3.85/0.86  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------