TSTP Solution File: LCL115-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL115-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 6.92s 7.11s
% Output : Refutation 6.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL115-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 2 13:17:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35 Sat Jul 2 13:17:08 2022
% 0.13/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27501.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.35 in usable.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 6
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 33
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 5
% 0.13/0.39 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.13/0.39 distinct function count: 2
% 0.13/0.39 distinct constant count: 2
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Changing weight limit from 60 to 22.
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Model 3 [ 1 0 50 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.44/6.69 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 230 givens.
% 6.44/6.69
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.92 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 300 givens.
% 6.69/6.92
% 6.69/6.95
% 6.69/6.95
% 6.69/6.95 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 6.69/6.95
% 6.69/6.95 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 305 givens.
% 6.69/6.95
% 6.69/6.96
% 6.69/6.96
% 6.69/6.96 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 6.69/6.96
% 6.69/6.96 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 310 givens.
% 6.69/6.96
% 6.81/7.00
% 6.81/7.00
% 6.81/7.00 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 6.81/7.00
% 6.81/7.00 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 325 givens.
% 6.81/7.00
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 -------- PROOF --------
% 6.92/7.11 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.92/7.11 % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 6.70 sec ----> 9326 [binary,9325.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 Length of proof is 15. Level of proof is 12.
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 6.92/7.11 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.92/7.11 % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 1 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 6.92/7.11 2 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(a,b)),not(b))).
% 6.92/7.11 3 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 6.92/7.11 4 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))).
% 6.92/7.11 5 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),implies(implies(B,A),A))).
% 6.92/7.11 6 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))).
% 6.92/7.11 11 [hyper,4,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(implies(not(B),not(A)),C))).
% 6.92/7.11 12 [hyper,4,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(B,C))).
% 6.92/7.11 15 [hyper,12,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),implies(A,B))).
% 6.92/7.11 18 [hyper,15,1,4] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(not(A),C))).
% 6.92/7.11 19 [hyper,15,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(B),implies(B,C)))).
% 6.92/7.11 20 [hyper,5,1,12] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),B))).
% 6.92/7.11 23 [hyper,19,1,5] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),implies(A,B)),C),C)).
% 6.92/7.11 88 [hyper,23,1,12] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)).
% 6.92/7.11 91 [hyper,88,1,20] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,A),B),B)).
% 6.92/7.11 149 [hyper,11,1,91] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(implies(B,B))),A)).
% 6.92/7.11 161 [hyper,149,1,18] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),A)).
% 6.92/7.11 170 [hyper,161,1,6] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,not(not(A)))).
% 6.92/7.11 206 [hyper,170,1,11] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),not(not(implies(B,A))))).
% 6.92/7.11 380 [hyper,206,1,18] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),not(not(implies(B,A))))).
% 6.92/7.11 9325 [hyper,380,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(A,B)),not(B))).
% 6.92/7.11 9326 [binary,9325.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 % SZS output end Refutation
% 6.92/7.11 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 ============ end of search ============
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 true clauses given 133 (37.7%)
% 6.92/7.11 false clauses given 220
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 FALSE TRUE
% 6.92/7.11 10 0 43
% 6.92/7.11 11 0 119
% 6.92/7.11 12 0 239
% 6.92/7.11 13 1 370
% 6.92/7.11 14 238 558
% 6.92/7.11 15 254 577
% 6.92/7.11 16 860 517
% 6.92/7.11 17 741 165
% 6.92/7.11 18 498 6
% 6.92/7.11 tot: 2592 2594 (50.0% true)
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 6.92/7.11
% 6.92/7.11 Process 27501 finished Sat Jul 2 13:17:15 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------