TSTP Solution File: LCL115-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LCL115-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:03:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.00s 2.21s
% Output   : Refutation 2.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  22 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (  10 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | is_a_theorem(B) ),
    file('LCL115-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(a,b)),not(b))),
    file('LCL115-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))),
    file('LCL115-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    file('LCL115-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),implies(implies(B,A),A))),
    file('LCL115-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))),
    file('LCL115-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,B)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[3,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,3,1,3')] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(implies(not(B),not(A)),C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,1,6')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(B,C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,1,3')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,A)),C),C)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[5,1,7]),
    [iquote('hyper,5,1,7')] ).

cnf(23,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),implies(A,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,1,6')] ).

cnf(24,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,1,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,1,5')] ).

cnf(27,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(not(A),C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[23,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,23,1,4')] ).

cnf(59,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[20,1,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,20,1,16')] ).

cnf(63,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,A),B),B)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[59,1,24]),
    [iquote('hyper,59,1,24')] ).

cnf(348,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(implies(B,B))),A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[15,1,63]),
    [iquote('hyper,15,1,63')] ).

cnf(418,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[348,1,27]),
    [iquote('hyper,348,1,27')] ).

cnf(433,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,not(not(A)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[418,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,418,1,6')] ).

cnf(434,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(not(not(A)),B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[418,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,418,1,4')] ).

cnf(455,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,not(not(implies(B,A))))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[433,1,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,433,1,16')] ).

cnf(1274,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),not(not(implies(B,A))))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[434,1,455]),
    [iquote('hyper,434,1,455')] ).

cnf(2171,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(A,B)),not(B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[1274,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,1274,1,6')] ).

cnf(2172,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[2171,2]),
    [iquote('binary,2171.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL115-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:14:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.00/2.21  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 2.00/2.21  The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 2.00/2.21  Wed Jul 27 09:14:38 2022
% 2.00/2.21  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 29369.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.00/2.21  set(auto).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 2.00/2.21  clear(print_given).
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  list(usable).
% 2.00/2.21  0 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))| -is_a_theorem(X)|is_a_theorem(Y).
% 2.00/2.21  0 [] is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))).
% 2.00/2.21  0 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z)))).
% 2.00/2.21  0 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),Y),implies(implies(Y,X),X))).
% 2.00/2.21  0 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X),not(Y)),implies(Y,X))).
% 2.00/2.21  0 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(a,b)),not(b))).
% 2.00/2.21  end_of_list.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 2.00/2.21  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 2.00/2.21  in usable.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.00/2.21     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ------------> process usable:
% 2.00/2.21  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 2.00/2.21  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(a,b)),not(b))).
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ------------> process sos:
% 2.00/2.21  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 3 [] is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 2.00/2.21  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 4 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))).
% 2.00/2.21  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 5 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),implies(implies(B,A),A))).
% 2.00/2.21  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 6 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))).
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  Resetting weight limit to 11.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  Resetting weight limit to 11.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  sos_size=2033
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.08 sec ----> 2172 [binary,2171.1,2.1] $F.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  Length of proof is 16.  Level of proof is 10.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.00/2.21  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.00/2.21  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.00/2.21  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ============ end of search ============
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.00/2.21  clauses given                153
% 2.00/2.21  clauses generated          12715
% 2.00/2.21  clauses kept                2171
% 2.00/2.21  clauses forward subsumed    8010
% 2.00/2.21  clauses back subsumed          8
% 2.00/2.21  Kbytes malloced             4882
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.00/2.21  user CPU time          0.08          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.00/2.21  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.00/2.21  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.00/2.21  
% 2.00/2.21  Process 29369 finished Wed Jul 27 09:14:40 2022
% 2.00/2.21  Otter interrupted
% 2.00/2.21  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------