TSTP Solution File: LCL113-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL113-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.63s 7.84s
% Output : Refutation 7.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LCL113-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 14:47:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35 Mon Jul 4 14:47:11 2022
% 0.13/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27171.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.35 in usable.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.13/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 6
% 0.13/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 33
% 0.13/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 5
% 0.13/0.38 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.13/0.38 distinct function count: 2
% 0.13/0.38 distinct constant count: 2
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.83/6.06 Changing weight limit from 60 to 24.
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.83/6.06 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.83/6.06 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.83/6.06 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.83/6.06 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.83/6.06 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.83/6.06 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.83/6.06 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.83/6.06 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 225 givens.
% 5.83/6.06
% 5.92/6.14
% 5.92/6.14
% 5.92/6.14 Changing weight limit from 24 to 22.
% 5.92/6.14
% 5.92/6.14 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 230 givens.
% 5.92/6.14
% 5.92/6.17
% 5.92/6.17
% 5.92/6.17 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 5.92/6.17
% 5.92/6.17 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 235 givens.
% 5.92/6.17
% 6.02/6.20
% 6.02/6.20
% 6.02/6.20 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 6.02/6.20
% 6.02/6.20 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 240 givens.
% 6.02/6.20
% 6.22/6.43
% 6.22/6.43
% 6.22/6.43 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 6.22/6.43
% 6.22/6.43 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 300 givens.
% 6.22/6.43
% 6.35/6.54
% 6.35/6.54
% 6.35/6.54 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 6.35/6.54
% 6.35/6.54 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 325 givens.
% 6.35/6.54
% 7.04/7.28
% 7.04/7.28
% 7.04/7.28 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 7.04/7.28
% 7.04/7.28 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 7.04/7.28
% 7.04/7.28
% 7.04/7.28 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 490 givens.
% 7.04/7.28
% 7.52/7.71
% 7.52/7.71
% 7.52/7.71 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 7.52/7.71
% 7.52/7.71 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 630 givens.
% 7.52/7.71
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 -------- PROOF --------
% 7.63/7.84 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.63/7.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 7.41 sec ----> 23224 [binary,23223.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 Length of proof is 17. Level of proof is 10.
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 7.63/7.84 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.63/7.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 1 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 7.63/7.84 2 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),b),implies(not(b),a))).
% 7.63/7.84 3 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 7.63/7.84 4 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))).
% 7.63/7.84 5 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),implies(implies(B,A),A))).
% 7.63/7.84 6 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))).
% 7.63/7.84 8 [hyper,6,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),not(C)),implies(C,B)))).
% 7.63/7.84 9 [hyper,4,1,4] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),implies(implies(C,A),D))).
% 7.63/7.84 12 [hyper,4,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(B,C))).
% 7.63/7.84 15 [hyper,12,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),implies(A,B))).
% 7.63/7.84 18 [hyper,15,1,4] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(not(A),C))).
% 7.63/7.84 19 [hyper,15,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(B),implies(B,C)))).
% 7.63/7.84 20 [hyper,5,1,12] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),B))).
% 7.63/7.84 23 [hyper,19,1,5] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),implies(A,B)),C),C)).
% 7.63/7.84 30 [hyper,18,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),implies(B,A))).
% 7.63/7.84 34 [hyper,30,1,4] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(not(not(B)),C))).
% 7.63/7.84 65 [hyper,8,1,5] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A)),C),C)).
% 7.63/7.84 115 [hyper,34,1,23] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),A)).
% 7.63/7.84 124 [hyper,115,1,6] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,not(not(A)))).
% 7.63/7.84 130 [hyper,124,1,20] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,not(not(A))),B),B)).
% 7.63/7.84 338 [hyper,65,1,9] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),not(C))),implies(A,implies(C,B)))).
% 7.63/7.84 7600 [hyper,130,1,9] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(A,not(not(B))))).
% 7.63/7.84 23223 [hyper,7600,1,338] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),implies(not(B),A))).
% 7.63/7.84 23224 [binary,23223.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.63/7.84 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 ============ end of search ============
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 true clauses given 240 (35.9%)
% 7.63/7.84 false clauses given 429
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 FALSE TRUE
% 7.63/7.84 10 0 6
% 7.63/7.84 11 0 129
% 7.63/7.84 12 0 443
% 7.63/7.84 13 0 652
% 7.63/7.84 14 259 1319
% 7.63/7.84 15 239 19
% 7.63/7.84 16 2016 66
% 7.63/7.84 tot: 2514 2634 (51.2% true)
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 7.63/7.84
% 7.63/7.84 Process 27171 finished Mon Jul 4 14:47:18 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------