TSTP Solution File: LCL111-2 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : LCL111-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:17:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.41s
% Output : Proof 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL111-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 05:33:18 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.41 Command-line arguments: --kbo-weight0 --lhs-weight 5 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --goal-heuristic
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.42 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.42 Axiom 1 (wajsberg_1): implies(truth, X) = X.
% 0.21/0.42 Axiom 2 (wajsberg_2): implies(implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z))) = truth.
% 0.21/0.42
% 0.21/0.42 Goal 1 (prove_mv_25): implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y))) = truth.
% 0.21/0.42 Proof:
% 0.21/0.42 implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y)))
% 0.21/0.42 = { by axiom 1 (wajsberg_1) R->L }
% 0.21/0.42 implies(truth, implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y))))
% 0.21/0.42 = { by axiom 1 (wajsberg_1) R->L }
% 0.21/0.42 implies(truth, implies(truth, implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y)))))
% 0.21/0.42 = { by axiom 2 (wajsberg_2) R->L }
% 0.21/0.42 implies(implies(implies(truth, implies(x, y)), implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(z, y)), implies(truth, implies(z, y)))), implies(truth, implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y)))))
% 0.21/0.42 = { by axiom 1 (wajsberg_1) }
% 0.21/0.42 implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(z, y)), implies(truth, implies(z, y)))), implies(truth, implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y)))))
% 0.21/0.42 = { by axiom 1 (wajsberg_1) }
% 0.21/0.42 implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(z, y)), implies(z, y))), implies(truth, implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y)))))
% 0.21/0.42 = { by axiom 2 (wajsberg_2) R->L }
% 0.21/0.42 implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(z, y)), implies(z, y))), implies(implies(implies(implies(z, x), implies(implies(x, y), implies(z, y))), implies(implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(z, y)), implies(z, y)), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y)))), implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y)))))
% 0.21/0.42 = { by axiom 2 (wajsberg_2) }
% 0.21/0.42 implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(z, y)), implies(z, y))), implies(implies(truth, implies(implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(z, y)), implies(z, y)), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y)))), implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y)))))
% 0.21/0.42 = { by axiom 1 (wajsberg_1) }
% 0.21/0.42 implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(z, y)), implies(z, y))), implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(x, y), implies(z, y)), implies(z, y)), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y))), implies(implies(x, y), implies(implies(z, x), implies(z, y)))))
% 0.21/0.42 = { by axiom 2 (wajsberg_2) }
% 0.21/0.42 truth
% 0.21/0.42 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.42
% 0.21/0.42 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------