TSTP Solution File: LCL109-5 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LCL109-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:03:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.65s 1.84s
% Output   : Refutation 1.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (  13 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ ordered(A,B)
    | implies(A,B) = truth ),
    file('LCL109-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( implies(A,B) != truth
    | ordered(A,B) ),
    file('LCL109-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ ordered(A,B)
    | ordered(implies(A,C),implies(B,C)) ),
    file('LCL109-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ ordered(A,implies(B,C))
    | ordered(B,implies(A,C)) ),
    file('LCL109-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    big_V(implies(x,y),implies(y,x)) != truth,
    file('LCL109-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    implies(truth,A) = A,
    file('LCL109-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    implies(implies(A,B),B) = implies(implies(B,A),A),
    file('LCL109-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    big_V(A,B) = implies(implies(A,B),B),
    file('LCL109-5.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    implies(implies(A,B),B) = big_V(A,B),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[15])]),
    [iquote('copy,15,flip.1')] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    big_V(A,B) = big_V(B,A),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[12])]),17,17]),
    [iquote('copy,12,flip.1,demod,17,17')] ).

cnf(32,plain,
    ordered(truth,truth),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[9,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,8,2')] ).

cnf(33,plain,
    ( truth = A
    | ~ ordered(truth,A) ),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9,1]),
    [iquote('para_into,8.1.1,1.2.1')] ).

cnf(41,plain,
    ordered(A,A),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[32,3]),9,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,32,3,demod,9,9')] ).

cnf(42,plain,
    ordered(A,big_V(A,B)),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[41,5]),17]),
    [iquote('hyper,41,5,demod,17')] ).

cnf(77,plain,
    big_V(truth,A) = truth,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[33,42])]),
    [iquote('hyper,33,42,flip.1')] ).

cnf(130,plain,
    big_V(A,truth) = truth,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29,77])]),
    [iquote('para_into,29.1.1,77.1.1,flip.1')] ).

cnf(135,plain,
    big_V(implies(y,x),implies(x,y)) != truth,
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29,6]),
    [iquote('para_from,29.1.1,6.1.1')] ).

cnf(137,plain,
    ordered(A,truth),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[130,42]),
    [iquote('para_from,130.1.1,42.1.2')] ).

cnf(139,plain,
    ordered(implies(A,B),B),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[137,3]),9]),
    [iquote('hyper,137,3,demod,9')] ).

cnf(180,plain,
    big_V(A,B) = truth,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[139,1]),17]),
    [iquote('hyper,139,1,demod,17')] ).

cnf(182,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[180,135]),
    [iquote('binary,180.1,135.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : LCL109-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:13:31 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.65/1.84  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.65/1.84  The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 1.65/1.84  Wed Jul 27 09:13:31 2022
% 1.65/1.84  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 22109.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.65/1.84  set(auto).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.65/1.84  clear(print_given).
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  list(usable).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] A=A.
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] implies(truth,X)=X.
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z)))=truth.
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] implies(implies(X,Y),Y)=implies(implies(Y,X),X).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] implies(implies(not(X),not(Y)),implies(Y,X))=truth.
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] big_V(X,Y)=implies(implies(X,Y),Y).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] big_hat(X,Y)=not(big_V(not(X),not(Y))).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] -ordered(X,Y)|implies(X,Y)=truth.
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] implies(X,Y)!=truth|ordered(X,Y).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] -ordered(X,Y)|ordered(implies(X,Z),implies(Y,Z)).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] -ordered(X,Y)|ordered(implies(Z,X),implies(Z,Y)).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] -ordered(X,implies(Y,Z))|ordered(Y,implies(X,Z)).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] -ordered(Y,implies(X,Z))|ordered(X,implies(Y,Z)).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] not(big_V(X,Y))=big_hat(not(X),not(Y)).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] not(big_hat(X,Y))=big_V(not(X),not(Y)).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] implies(big_V(X,Y),Z)=big_hat(implies(X,Z),implies(Y,Z)).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] implies(X,big_hat(Y,Z))=big_hat(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z)).
% 1.65/1.84  0 [] big_V(implies(x,y),implies(y,x))!=truth.
% 1.65/1.84  end_of_list.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.65/1.84  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 1.65/1.84  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.65/1.84     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  ------------> process usable:
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -ordered(A,B)|implies(A,B)=truth.
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] implies(A,B)!=truth|ordered(A,B).
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 3 [] -ordered(A,B)|ordered(implies(A,C),implies(B,C)).
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 4 [] -ordered(A,B)|ordered(implies(C,A),implies(C,B)).
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 5 [] -ordered(A,implies(B,C))|ordered(B,implies(A,C)).
% 1.65/1.84    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] -ordered(A,implies(B,C))|ordered(B,implies(A,C)).
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 6 [] big_V(implies(x,y),implies(y,x))!=truth.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  ------------> process sos:
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 7 [] A=A.
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 8 [] implies(truth,A)=A.
% 1.65/1.84  ---> New Demodulator: 9 [new_demod,8] implies(truth,A)=A.
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 10 [] implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))=truth.
% 1.65/1.84  ---> New Demodulator: 11 [new_demod,10] implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))=truth.
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 12 [] implies(implies(A,B),B)=implies(implies(B,A),A).
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 13 [] implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))=truth.
% 1.65/1.84  ---> New Demodulator: 14 [new_demod,13] implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))=truth.
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 16 [copy,15,flip.1] implies(implies(A,B),B)=big_V(A,B).
% 1.65/1.84  ---> New Demodulator: 17 [new_demod,16] implies(implies(A,B),B)=big_V(A,B).
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 19 [copy,18,flip.1] not(big_V(not(A),not(B)))=big_hat(A,B).
% 1.65/1.84  ---> New Demodulator: 20 [new_demod,19] not(big_V(not(A),not(B)))=big_hat(A,B).
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 21 [] not(big_V(A,B))=big_hat(not(A),not(B)).
% 1.65/1.84  ---> New Demodulator: 22 [new_demod,21] not(big_V(A,B))=big_hat(not(A),not(B)).
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 23 [] not(big_hat(A,B))=big_V(not(A),not(B)).
% 1.65/1.84  ---> New Demodulator: 24 [new_demod,23] not(big_hat(A,B))=big_V(not(A),not(B)).
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 25 [] implies(big_V(A,B),C)=big_hat(implies(A,C),implies(B,C)).
% 1.65/1.84  ---> New Demodulator: 26 [new_demod,25] implies(big_V(A,B),C)=big_hat(implies(A,C),implies(B,C)).
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 27 [] implies(A,big_hat(B,C))=big_hat(implies(A,B),implies(A,C)).
% 1.65/1.84  ---> New Demodulator: 28 [new_demod,27] implies(A,big_hat(B,C))=big_hat(implies(A,B),implies(A,C)).
% 1.65/1.84    Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [copy,7,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.65/1.84  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 9.
% 1.65/1.84  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 11.
% 1.65/1.84  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 29 [copy,12,flip.1,demod,17,17] big_V(A,B)=big_V(B,A).
% 1.65/1.84  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 14.
% 1.65/1.84  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 17.
% 1.65/1.84      >> back demodulating 12 with 17.
% 1.65/1.84  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 20.
% 1.65/1.84  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 22.
% 1.65/1.84      >> back demodulating 19 with 22.
% 1.65/1.84  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 24.
% 1.65/1.84  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 26.
% 1.65/1.84  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 28.
% 1.65/1.84    Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [copy,29,flip.1] big_V(A,B)=big_V(B,A).
% 1.65/1.84  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 31.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.01 sec ----> 182 [binary,180.1,135.1] $F.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  Length of proof is 12.  Level of proof is 8.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.65/1.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.65/1.84  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.65/1.84  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  ============ end of search ============
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.65/1.84  clauses given                 18
% 1.65/1.84  clauses generated            210
% 1.65/1.84  clauses kept                 140
% 1.65/1.84  clauses forward subsumed     110
% 1.65/1.84  clauses back subsumed         16
% 1.65/1.84  Kbytes malloced             1953
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.65/1.84  user CPU time          0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.65/1.84  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.65/1.84  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.65/1.84  
% 1.65/1.84  Process 22109 finished Wed Jul 27 09:13:33 2022
% 1.65/1.84  Otter interrupted
% 1.65/1.84  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------