TSTP Solution File: LCL109-3 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : LCL109-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:29:24 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.82s 1.55s
% Output : Refutation 2.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 20
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 27 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 34 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 182 ( 6 ~; 4 |; 0 &; 172 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 3 ( 3 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 0 ^; 54 !; 0 ?; 54 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(implies_type,type,
implies: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(a_type,type,
a: $i ).
thf(b_type,type,
b: $i ).
thf(truth_type,type,
truth: $i ).
thf(not_type,type,
not: $i > $i ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ A @ ( implies @ B @ A ) )
= truth ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_4) ).
thf(35,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ A @ ( implies @ B @ A ) )
= truth ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ ( not @ A ) @ ( not @ B ) )
= ( implies @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_10) ).
thf(48,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ ( not @ A ) @ ( not @ B ) )
= ( implies @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
( ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ a @ b ) @ ( implies @ b @ a ) ) @ ( implies @ b @ a ) )
!= truth ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_wajsberg_mv_4) ).
thf(16,plain,
( ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ a @ b ) @ ( implies @ b @ a ) ) @ ( implies @ b @ a ) )
!= truth ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(2,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( implies @ truth @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_1) ).
thf(19,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( implies @ truth @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ A @ ( implies @ B @ C ) )
= ( implies @ B @ ( implies @ A @ C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_7) ).
thf(42,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ A @ ( implies @ B @ C ) )
= ( implies @ B @ ( implies @ A @ C ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( implies @ A @ B )
!= ( implies @ B @ C ) )
| ( ( implies @ A @ C )
= truth ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_5) ).
thf(37,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( implies @ A @ B )
!= ( implies @ B @ C ) )
| ( ( implies @ A @ C )
= truth ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ A ) @ ( not @ B ) ) @ ( implies @ B @ A ) )
= truth ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_4) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ A ) @ ( not @ B ) ) @ ( implies @ B @ A ) )
= truth ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( not @ ( not @ A ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_9) ).
thf(46,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( not @ ( not @ A ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( implies @ A @ B )
!= ( implies @ B @ A ) )
| ( A = B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_2) ).
thf(29,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( implies @ A @ B )
!= ( implies @ B @ A ) )
| ( A = B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ B @ C ) @ ( implies @ A @ C ) ) )
= truth ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_2) ).
thf(21,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ B @ C ) @ ( implies @ A @ C ) ) )
= truth ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( implies @ A @ truth )
= truth ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_3) ).
thf(33,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( implies @ A @ truth )
= truth ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( implies @ A @ ( not @ truth ) )
= ( not @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_8) ).
thf(44,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( implies @ A @ ( not @ truth ) )
= ( not @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( implies @ A @ A )
= truth ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1) ).
thf(27,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( implies @ A @ A )
= truth ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ C @ A ) @ ( implies @ C @ B ) ) )
= truth ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_6) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ C @ A ) @ ( implies @ C @ B ) ) )
= truth ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ B )
= ( implies @ ( implies @ B @ A ) @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wajsberg_3) ).
thf(23,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ B )
= ( implies @ ( implies @ B @ A ) @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(109,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[35,48,16,19,42,37,25,46,29,21,33,44,27,40,23]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07 % Problem : LCL109-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Thu May 18 16:10:05 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.64/0.65 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.81/0.76 % [INFO] Parsing done (109ms).
% 0.81/0.77 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.25/0.97 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.25/0.97 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.25/0.97 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.46/1.02 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 14 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.46/1.04 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 14 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 1.46/1.05 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 1.46/1.06 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.46/1.06 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 2.82/1.55 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.82/1.55 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 2.82/1.55 % Time passed: 1177ms (effective reasoning time: 782ms)
% 2.82/1.55 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.82/1.55 % Axioms used in derivation (14): wajsberg_3, lemma_4, wajsberg_4, lemma_1, lemma_6, wajsberg_2, lemma_8, lemma_3, lemma_7, lemma_10, lemma_5, wajsberg_1, lemma_9, lemma_2
% 2.82/1.55 % No. of inferences in proof: 31
% 2.82/1.55 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1177 ms resp. 782 ms w/o parsing
% 2.82/1.58 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.82/1.58 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------