TSTP Solution File: LCL109-10 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : LCL109-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:19:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 53.29s 7.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 53.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL109-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 09:00:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.20/0.37  # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.20/0.37  #
% 0.20/0.37  # Number of axioms: 16 Number of unprocessed: 16
% 0.20/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.20/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.20/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.20/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.20/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.20/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.20/0.37  # 16 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.20/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.20/0.37  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.20/0.37  # Found 16 unit axioms.
% 0.20/0.37  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.20/0.37  # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.20/0.37  # 16 unit axiom clauses
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.20/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.20/0.37  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.20/0.37  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.20/0.37  # Returning from population with 24 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.20/0.37  # We now have 24 tableaux to operate on
% 53.29/7.05  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 53.29/7.05  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 53.29/7.05  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 53.29/7.05  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 53.29/7.05  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 53.29/7.05  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 53.29/7.05  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 53.29/7.05  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 53.29/7.05  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 53.29/7.05  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 53.29/7.05  # Begin clausification derivation
% 53.29/7.05  
% 53.29/7.05  # End clausification derivation
% 53.29/7.05  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (not(not(X1))=X1)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (implies(X1,truth)=truth)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (implies(truth,X1)=X1)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (implies(X1,X1)=truth)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (implies(X1,not(truth))=not(X1))).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))=truth)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (implies(not(X1),not(X2))=implies(X2,X1))).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))=implies(X2,implies(X1,X3)))).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)=implies(implies(X2,X1),X1))).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))=truth)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X3,X1),implies(X3,X2)))=truth)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))=truth)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a))!=truth)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (ifeq(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1),X1,X2)=X2)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (ifeq(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3),truth)=truth)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 53.29/7.05  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 53.29/7.05  # Begin printing tableau
% 53.29/7.05  # Found 6 steps
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (not(not(truth))=truth), inference(start_rule)).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (not(not(truth))=truth), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_37])).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_62, plain, (implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a))=truth), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_32])).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_63, plain, (implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a))!=not(not(truth))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_37])).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_80, plain, (implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a))!=not(not(implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 53.29/7.05  cnf(i_0_81, plain, (not(not(implies(implies(implies(a,b),implies(b,a)),implies(b,a))))!=not(not(truth))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_81, ...])).
% 53.29/7.05  # End printing tableau
% 53.29/7.05  # SZS output end
% 53.29/7.05  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 53.29/7.07  # Child (8746) has found a proof.
% 53.29/7.07  
% 53.29/7.07  # Proof search is over...
% 53.29/7.07  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------