TSTP Solution File: LCL107-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LCL107-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:20:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(lg_27_1690,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),Z),equivalent(equivalent(U,V),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(W,V),equivalent(W,U)),X1))),equivalent(Z,equivalent(equivalent(Y,X),X1)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lg_27_1690) ).

cnf(prove_p_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(equivalent(e,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,e),c)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p_1) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(Z,Y),equivalent(Z,X)),U)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(V,W),equivalent(equivalent(X1,V),equivalent(X1,W))),U))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,lg_27_1690,lg_27_1690]) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(b,e),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c)),equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(Z,Y),equivalent(Z,X)),equivalent(equivalent(a,e),c))))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,lg_27_1690,prove_p_1]) ).

cnf(7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(X,Z)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(U,equivalent(equivalent(V,W),equivalent(V,X1))),equivalent(U,equivalent(W,X1))),Y1)),equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),Y1))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,4,lg_27_1690]) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(Z,U)),equivalent(Y,equivalent(Z,V)))),equivalent(X,equivalent(U,V))),W),W)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,7,7]) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,Z)),equivalent(equivalent(U,equivalent(V,X)),equivalent(U,equivalent(V,equivalent(Y,W))))),equivalent(Z,W))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,12,12]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,equivalent(equivalent(Z,U),equivalent(Z,V)))),equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,W))),equivalent(equivalent(U,V),W))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,12,lg_27_1690]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(Z,X),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(U,Y),equivalent(U,Z)),V))),V)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,20,4]) ).

cnf(50,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(Y,X),Z)),Z)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,21,36]) ).

cnf(51,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,Z)),U),equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(V,Y),equivalent(V,Z))),U))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,21,4]) ).

cnf(74,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,51,50]) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(Z,X),equivalent(Z,Y)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,74,21]) ).

cnf(96,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,90,90,5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : LCL107-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 21:54:59 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  "."
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T21:54:59
% 0.21/0.50  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n013.cluster.edu at 2022-07-03T21:54:59
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  #||
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.57  ||#
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.38/0.57  ;       230 formulas have been input or derived (from 17 formulas).
% 0.38/0.57  ;        96 (42%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.38/0.57  ;           96 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.38/0.57  ; 
% 0.38/0.57  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.001   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.001   1%   Assert                       (3 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.024  33%   Process new row              (150 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.011  15%   Resolution                   (32 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.004   5%   Paramodulation               (16 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (1 call)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (1 call)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (1 call)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.004   5%   Forward simplification       (150 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.006   8%   Backward simplification      (96 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.022  30%   Other
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.073        Total
% 0.38/0.57  ;     0.076        Real time
% 0.38/0.57  ; 
% 0.38/0.57  ; Term-hash-array has 586 terms in all.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 entry (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 nodes (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1 call.
% 0.38/0.57  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1 call.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Path-index has 590 entries (590 at peak, 590 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Path-index has 1,369 nodes (1,369 at peak, 1,369 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Trie-index has 590 entries (590 at peak, 590 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Trie-index has 4,748 nodes (4,748 at peak, 4,748 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.57  ; Retrieved 119 generalization terms in 147 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Retrieved 312 instance terms in 94 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; Retrieved 4,825 unifiable terms in 368 calls.
% 0.38/0.57  ; 
% 0.38/0.57  ; The agenda of rows to process has 30 entries:
% 0.38/0.57  ;     1 with value 15              1 with value 35               1 with value 46
% 0.38/0.57  ;     1 with value 20              1 with value 37               1 with value 48
% 0.38/0.57  ;     1 with value 25              6 with value 40               1 with value 49
% 0.38/0.57  ;     4 with value 30              1 with value 41               1 with value 54
% 0.38/0.57  ;     1 with value 31              1 with value 43               1 with value 56
% 0.38/0.57  ;     3 with value 34              4 with value 45
% 0.38/0.57  ; The agenda of rows to give has 79 entries:
% 0.38/0.57  ;     3 with value (4 29)          1 with value (4 44)           1 with value (4 57)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     1 with value (4 32)          1 with value (4 45)           1 with value (4 58)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     3 with value (4 34)          8 with value (4 46)           3 with value (4 59)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     5 with value (4 36)          2 with value (4 47)           3 with value (4 60)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     4 with value (4 37)          4 with value (4 48)           1 with value (4 61)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     5 with value (4 38)          5 with value (4 49)           1 with value (4 62)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     4 with value (4 40)          1 with value (4 50)           4 with value (4 65)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     2 with value (4 41)          2 with value (4 51)           1 with value (4 66)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     4 with value (4 42)          6 with value (4 53)           1 with value (4 72)
% 0.38/0.57  ;     1 with value (4 43)          1 with value (4 54)
% 0.38/0.57  Evaluation took:
% 0.38/0.57    0.077 seconds of real time
% 0.38/0.57    0.070092 seconds of user run time
% 0.38/0.57    0.006964 seconds of system run time
% 0.38/0.57    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.38/0.57    0 page faults and
% 0.38/0.57    5,831,232 bytes consed.
% 0.38/0.57  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.38/0.57  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T21:55:00
% 0.38/0.57  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.38/0.57  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------