TSTP Solution File: LCL106-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : LCL106-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 11:04:11 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.06s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X0)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',q_1) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X0,X2)),equivalent(X1,X2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',q_4) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(equivalent(c,a),equivalent(c,b)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_q_2) ).
cnf(c_59,plain,
equivalent(a,b) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_60,plain,
equivalent(c,a) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_61,plain,
equivalent(c,b) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_62,plain,
equivalent(sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_63,plain,
equivalent(sP0_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(sP4_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_61,c_60,c_62,c_59,c_63]) ).
cnf(c_117,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,c),equivalent(X0,b)),sP2_iProver_def)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_119,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,sP0_iProver_def),equivalent(X0,sP3_iProver_def)),sP4_iProver_def)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_120,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X0,X2)))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_145,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(a,c),equivalent(sP1_iProver_def,X0)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_149,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X0))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_176,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,sP0_iProver_def),equivalent(X0,sP3_iProver_def)))
| is_a_theorem(sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_185,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,c),sP0_iProver_def),sP2_iProver_def)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_117]) ).
cnf(c_296,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(sP2_iProver_def,equivalent(equivalent(a,c),sP3_iProver_def))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_145]) ).
cnf(c_345,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X0),X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_149,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_356,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,sP0_iProver_def),equivalent(X0,sP3_iProver_def))),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_64,c_176]) ).
cnf(c_598,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_345,c_120]) ).
cnf(c_1462,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(sP2_iProver_def,X0))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,c),sP0_iProver_def),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_185,c_598]) ).
cnf(c_5621,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(sP2_iProver_def,equivalent(equivalent(a,c),sP3_iProver_def))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1462,c_356]) ).
cnf(c_5704,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_5621,c_296]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL106-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 22 16:32:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 4.06/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.06/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 4.06/1.16 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 4.06/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 ------ Parsing...successful
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... pe_s pe_e
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e scvd_s sp: 0 0s scvd_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 ------ Preprocessing...
% 4.06/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 4.06/1.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 clauses 9
% 4.06/1.16 conjectures 1
% 4.06/1.16 EPR 1
% 4.06/1.16 Horn 9
% 4.06/1.16 unary 8
% 4.06/1.16 binary 0
% 4.06/1.16 lits 11
% 4.06/1.16 lits eq 5
% 4.06/1.16 fd_pure 0
% 4.06/1.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 4.06/1.16 fd_cond 0
% 4.06/1.16 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 4.06/1.16 AC symbols 0
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 ------
% 4.06/1.16 Current options:
% 4.06/1.16 ------
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.06/1.16
% 4.06/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------