TSTP Solution File: LCL106-1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : LCL106-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 07:42:30 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.90s 0.98s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X0)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',q_1) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X0,X2)),equivalent(X1,X2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',q_4) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(equivalent(c,a),equivalent(c,b)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_q_2) ).
cnf(c_119,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X0))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_139,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X0,X2)))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_163,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X0),X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_202,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_163,c_139]) ).
cnf(c_305,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X2))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X3,X0),equivalent(X3,X1)),X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_202]) ).
cnf(c_473,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X0),X3)))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X3)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_305,c_139]) ).
cnf(c_753,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X0),equivalent(X2,X1)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_473]) ).
cnf(c_765,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_753]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : LCL106-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.27 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.27 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.27 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 04:51:42 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.35 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.35 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.90/0.98 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.90/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 ------ iProver source info
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.90/0.98 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.90/0.98 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.90/0.98 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.90/0.98 ------ Proving...
% 1.90/0.98 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 clauses 4
% 1.90/0.98 conjectures 1
% 1.90/0.98 EPR 0
% 1.90/0.98 Horn 4
% 1.90/0.98 unary 3
% 1.90/0.98 binary 0
% 1.90/0.98 lits 6
% 1.90/0.98 lits eq 0
% 1.90/0.98 fd_pure 0
% 1.90/0.98 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.90/0.98 fd_cond 0
% 1.90/0.98 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.90/0.98 AC symbols 0
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 ------
% 1.90/0.98 Current options:
% 1.90/0.98 ------
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 ------ Proving...
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.90/0.98
% 1.90/0.98
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------