TSTP Solution File: LCL106-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL106-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qwnVwuKqKi true
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:58:12 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL106-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qwnVwuKqKi true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 04:48:10 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.63 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.22/0.75 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.22/0.75 % BCE start: 4
% 0.22/0.75 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.22/0.75 % PE start: 4
% 0.22/0.75 logic: neq
% 0.22/0.75 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.22/0.75 % done 18 iterations in 0.021s
% 0.22/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.22/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.75 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(equivalent_type, type, equivalent: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(prove_q_2, conjecture,
% 0.22/0.75 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @ a @ b ) @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ c @ a ) @ ( equivalent @ c @ b ) ) ))).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.22/0.75 (~( is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @ a @ b ) @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ c @ a ) @ ( equivalent @ c @ b ) ) ) )),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_q_2])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ b) @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ c @ a) @ (equivalent @ c @ b))))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(q_1, axiom,
% 0.22/0.75 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @
% 0.22/0.75 X @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @ Y @ Z ) @ ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ Z @ Y ) @ X ) ) ))).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [q_1])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(q_4, axiom,
% 0.22/0.75 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) @ ( equivalent @ X @ Z ) ) @
% 0.22/0.75 ( equivalent @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [q_4])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [q_1])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.22/0.75 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) ) ) |
% 0.22/0.75 ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.22/0.75 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.22/0.75 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.22/0.75 | (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.22/0.75 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.22/0.75 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.22/0.75 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.22/0.75 | (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [q_4])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.22/0.75 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.22/0.75 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0)))
% 0.22/0.75 | (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1))
% 0.22/0.75 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))
% 0.22/0.75 | (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ X3))
% 0.22/0.75 | (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0)) @
% 0.22/0.75 X3)))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0)))
% 0.22/0.75 | (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X3) @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))
% 0.22/0.75 | (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3) @ X0)))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 0.22/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.75 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X0) @
% 0.22/0.75 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl19])).
% 0.22/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain, ($false),
% 0.22/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl34])).
% 0.22/0.75
% 0.22/0.75 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.75
% 0.22/0.75
% 0.22/0.75 % Terminating...
% 0.89/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 0.89/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------