TSTP Solution File: LCL104-1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : LCL104-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 07:42:30 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.12s 1.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 60 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),equivalent(X2,X3)),X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p_4) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X1,X0),X2)),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',q_3) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(equivalent(e,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,e),c)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p_1) ).
cnf(c_118,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X1,X0),X2)))
| is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_151,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),equivalent(X2,X3)),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_152,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X0),equivalent(X2,X1)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_118]) ).
cnf(c_173,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X0),equivalent(X2,X1))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_152,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_221,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X0))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_173,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_266,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X0),equivalent(X2,X1))),X3))
| is_a_theorem(X3) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_151,c_118]) ).
cnf(c_296,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),X3))))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X3)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_221]) ).
cnf(c_420,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X0),equivalent(X2,X1))),X3),X3)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_296]) ).
cnf(c_634,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X0,X2)),X3))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X3)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_173,c_266]) ).
cnf(c_635,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)),equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),equivalent(X3,X2))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_420,c_266]) ).
cnf(c_687,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X0,X2)),equivalent(X1,X2))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_635,c_296]) ).
cnf(c_743,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3))))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X2,X3))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_687,c_221]) ).
cnf(c_1637,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X0,X2)),X3),equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X3))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_743]) ).
cnf(c_1772,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X0,X3),X2)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1637,c_634]) ).
cnf(c_1774,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_1772]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL104-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.36 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 04:43:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.12/1.23 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.12/1.23 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 ------ iProver source info
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.12/1.23 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.12/1.23 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.12/1.23 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.12/1.23 ------ Proving...
% 3.12/1.23 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 clauses 4
% 3.12/1.23 conjectures 1
% 3.12/1.23 EPR 0
% 3.12/1.23 Horn 4
% 3.12/1.23 unary 3
% 3.12/1.23 binary 0
% 3.12/1.23 lits 6
% 3.12/1.23 lits eq 0
% 3.12/1.23 fd_pure 0
% 3.12/1.23 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.12/1.23 fd_cond 0
% 3.12/1.23 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 3.12/1.23 AC symbols 0
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 ------
% 3.12/1.23 Current options:
% 3.12/1.23 ------
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 ------ Proving...
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.12/1.23
% 3.12/1.23
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------