TSTP Solution File: LCL104-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LCL104-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:20:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(p_4,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(Y,U)),equivalent(Z,U)),X))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p_4) ).

cnf(q_3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(Y,X),Z)),Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',q_3) ).

cnf(prove_p_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(equivalent(e,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,e),c)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p_1) ).

cnf(7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(Z,X),equivalent(Z,Y)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,p_4,q_3]) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,Z)),equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(U,Y),equivalent(U,Z))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,7,7]) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(equivalent(Z,Y),U))),equivalent(X,U))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,7,q_3]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(X,Z)),equivalent(Y,Z))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,13,12]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(Y,U))),equivalent(X,equivalent(Z,U)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,26,7]) ).

cnf(65,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(X,Z)),U),equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),U))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,36,p_4]) ).

cnf(88,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,65,65,prove_p_1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : LCL104-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.31  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.31  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 04:18:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.42  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.43  * 
% 0.17/0.43  * 
% 0.17/0.43  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.17/0.43  * 
% 0.17/0.43  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.17/0.43  * 
% 0.17/0.43  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.17/0.43   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.17/0.43   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.17/0.43   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.17/0.43   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.17/0.43   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.17/0.43   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.17/0.43   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.17/0.43  * 
% 0.17/0.43  "."
% 0.17/0.43  * 
% 0.17/0.43  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-04T04:18:13
% 0.17/0.43  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n023.cluster.edu at 2022-07-04T04:18:13
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  #||
% 0.17/0.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46  ||#
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.17/0.46  ;       332 formulas have been input or derived (from 17 formulas).
% 0.17/0.46  ;        88 (27%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.17/0.46  ;           88 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.17/0.46  ; 
% 0.17/0.46  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.001   4%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (4 calls)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.006  21%   Process new row              (220 calls)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.004  14%   Resolution                   (32 calls)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.001   4%   Paramodulation               (16 calls)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (1 call)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (1 call)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (1 call)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.002   7%   Forward simplification       (220 calls)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.001   4%   Backward simplification      (88 calls)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.013  46%   Other
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.028        Total
% 0.17/0.46  ;     0.030        Real time
% 0.17/0.46  ; 
% 0.17/0.46  ; Term-hash-array has 410 terms in all.
% 0.17/0.46  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 entry (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 nodes (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1 call.
% 0.17/0.46  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1 call.
% 0.17/0.46  ; Path-index has 414 entries (414 at peak, 414 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46  ; Path-index has 697 nodes (697 at peak, 697 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46  ; Trie-index has 414 entries (414 at peak, 414 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46  ; Trie-index has 2,135 nodes (2,135 at peak, 2,135 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46  ; Retrieved 389 generalization terms in 217 calls.
% 0.17/0.46  ; Retrieved 170 instance terms in 86 calls.
% 0.17/0.46  ; Retrieved 3,916 unifiable terms in 385 calls.
% 0.17/0.46  ; 
% 0.17/0.46  ; The agenda of rows to process has 39 entries:
% 0.17/0.46  ;     1 with value 17              3 with value 31               1 with value 37
% 0.17/0.46  ;     4 with value 22              4 with value 32               1 with value 40
% 0.17/0.46  ;     1 with value 23              1 with value 36               1 with value 44
% 0.17/0.46  ;    22 with value 27
% 0.17/0.46  ; The agenda of rows to give has 71 entries:
% 0.17/0.46  ;     3 with value (4 26)          2 with value (4 33)           2 with value (4 39)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     1 with value (4 27)          3 with value (4 34)           2 with value (4 40)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     2 with value (4 28)          7 with value (4 35)           2 with value (4 41)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     5 with value (4 29)          7 with value (4 36)           3 with value (4 42)
% 0.17/0.46  ;    12 with value (4 30)          3 with value (4 37)           3 with value (4 43)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     6 with value (4 31)          5 with value (4 38)           1 with value (4 44)
% 0.17/0.46  ;     2 with value (4 32)
% 0.17/0.46  Evaluation took:
% 0.17/0.46    0.031 seconds of real time
% 0.17/0.46    0.02606 seconds of user run time
% 0.17/0.46    0.004129 seconds of system run time
% 0.17/0.46    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.17/0.46    0 page faults and
% 0.17/0.46    4,208,912 bytes consed.
% 0.17/0.46  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.17/0.46  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-04T04:18:13
% 0.17/0.46  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.17/0.46  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------