TSTP Solution File: LCL101-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LCL101-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:03:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.87s 2.07s
% Output   : Refutation 1.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | is_a_theorem(B) ),
    file('LCL101-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,b),c),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e,b),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,e),c)))),
    file('LCL101-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(A,C)),e_quivalent(B,C)),D),D)),
    file('LCL101-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),e_quivalent(B,D)),e_quivalent(C,D)),A))),
    file('LCL101-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(A,C)),e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(D,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(E,F),e_quivalent(E,G)),e_quivalent(F,G)),D)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,1,4')] ).

cnf(6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(A,C)),e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(D,E),e_quivalent(D,F)),e_quivalent(E,F)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,1,3')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(A,C)),e_quivalent(B,C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1,3')] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(A,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[9,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,9,1,6')] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[10,1,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,10,1,9')] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(C,D),e_quivalent(C,E)),e_quivalent(D,E)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(F,A),e_quivalent(F,B))))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[5,1,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,5,1,9')] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(A,C)),e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(D,D))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[11,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,11,1,4')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(C,A),e_quivalent(C,B)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[15,1,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,15,1,9')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),e_quivalent(B,D))),e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(C,D)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,1,3')] ).

cnf(118,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),C),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(D,B),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,D),C)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[13,1,20]),
    [iquote('hyper,13,1,20')] ).

cnf(119,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[118,2]),
    [iquote('binary,118.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : LCL101-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:26:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.87/2.07  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.87/2.07  The process was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 1.87/2.07  Wed Jul 27 09:26:57 2022
% 1.87/2.07  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 22381.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.87/2.07  set(auto).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.87/2.07  clear(print_given).
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  list(usable).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(X,Y))| -is_a_theorem(X)|is_a_theorem(Y).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(X,Y),e_quivalent(X,Z)),e_quivalent(Y,Z)),U),U)).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(X,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(Y,Z),e_quivalent(Y,U)),e_quivalent(Z,U)),X))).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,b),c),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e,b),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,e),c)))).
% 1.87/2.07  end_of_list.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.87/2.07  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.87/2.07  in usable.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ------------> process usable:
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 2 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,b),c),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e,b),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,e),c)))).
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ------------> process sos:
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 3 [] is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(A,C)),e_quivalent(B,C)),D),D)).
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 4 [] is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),e_quivalent(B,D)),e_quivalent(C,D)),A))).
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 119 [binary,118.1,2.1] $F.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  Length of proof is 10.  Level of proof is 8.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.87/2.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.87/2.07  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.87/2.07  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ============ end of search ============
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.87/2.07  clauses given                 21
% 1.87/2.07  clauses generated            259
% 1.87/2.07  clauses kept                 118
% 1.87/2.07  clauses forward subsumed     145
% 1.87/2.07  clauses back subsumed          2
% 1.87/2.07  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.87/2.07  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.87/2.07  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.87/2.07  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  Process 22381 finished Wed Jul 27 09:26:58 2022
% 1.87/2.07  Otter interrupted
% 1.87/2.07  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------