TSTP Solution File: LCL098-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : LCL098-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:19:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.35s 2.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.12 % Problem : LCL098-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 21:07:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S00
% 0.19/0.37 # and selection function NoSelection.
% 0.19/0.37 #
% 0.19/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.37 # Number of axioms: 3 Number of unprocessed: 3
% 0.19/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 2.15/2.38 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 2.15/2.38 # Local unification is enabled...
% 2.15/2.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 2.15/2.38 # 3 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 2.15/2.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 2.15/2.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 2.15/2.38 # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 2.15/2.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 2.15/2.38 # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 2.15/2.38 # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 2.15/2.38
% 2.15/2.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 2.15/2.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 2.35/2.57 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 2.35/2.57 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 2.35/2.57 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 2.35/2.57 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 2.35/2.57 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 2.35/2.57 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 2.35/2.57 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 2.35/2.57 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 2.35/2.57 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.35/2.57 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.35/2.57 # Begin clausification derivation
% 2.35/2.57
% 2.35/2.57 # End clausification derivation
% 2.35/2.57 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 2.35/2.57 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),X4),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X4)),X5),X5)))).
% 2.35/2.57 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e)))))).
% 2.35/2.57 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (is_a_theorem(X1)|~is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X1))|~is_a_theorem(X2))).
% 2.35/2.57 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 2.35/2.57 # Begin printing tableau
% 2.35/2.57 # Found 6 steps
% 2.35/2.57 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e))))), inference(start_rule)).
% 2.35/2.57 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (~is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 2.35/2.57 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X10,X9),equivalent(X10,X8)),X7),equivalent(equivalent(X9,X8),X7)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e)))),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e)))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 2.35/2.57 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X10,X9),equivalent(X10,X8)),X7),equivalent(equivalent(X9,X8),X7)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e)))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 2.35/2.57 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (~is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),X4),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X4)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X10,X9),equivalent(X10,X8)),X7),equivalent(equivalent(X9,X8),X7)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e))))),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X10,X9),equivalent(X10,X8)),X7),equivalent(equivalent(X9,X8),X7)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e))))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 2.35/2.57 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),X4),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X4)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X10,X9),equivalent(X10,X8)),X7),equivalent(equivalent(X9,X8),X7)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e))))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_13, ...])).
% 2.35/2.57 # End printing tableau
% 2.35/2.57 # SZS output end
% 2.35/2.57 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 2.35/2.57 # Returning from population with 1 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 2.35/2.57 # We now have 1 tableaux to operate on
% 2.35/2.57 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 2.35/2.57 # Proof search is over...
% 2.35/2.57 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------