TSTP Solution File: LCL098-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL098-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:22 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.59s 2.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   9 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  13   ~;  11   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   2   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (;  65   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ is_a_theorem > equivalent > #nlpp > falsehood > e > c > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(is_a_theorem,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(falsehood,type,
    falsehood: $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(equivalent,type,
    equivalent: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(e,type,
    e: $i ).

tff(c,type,
    c: $i ).

tff(f_37,axiom,
    ! [U,Z,X,Y,V] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(X,Z)),U),equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),U)),V),V)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_35,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
      | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_39,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e)))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [V_7,Z_4,Y_6,U_3,X_5] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_5,Y_6),equivalent(X_5,Z_4)),U_3),equivalent(equivalent(Y_6,Z_4),U_3)),V_7),V_7)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [U_13,X_14,Y_12,V_10,Z_11] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_14,Y_12),equivalent(X_14,Z_11)),U_13),equivalent(equivalent(Y_12,Z_11),U_13)),V_10),V_10)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [Y_2,X_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Y_2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_1,Y_2)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_13,plain,
    ! [Y_16,V_18,U_15,Z_19,X_17] :
      ( is_a_theorem(V_18)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_17,Y_16),equivalent(X_17,Z_19)),U_15),equivalent(equivalent(Y_16,Z_19),U_15)),V_18)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_2]) ).

tff(c_19,plain,
    ! [X_20,Z_21,Z_22,Y_23] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_20,Z_21),Z_22),equivalent(equivalent(Y_23,Z_21),equivalent(equivalent(X_20,Y_23),Z_22)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_13]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [U_13,X_14,Y_12,V_10,Z_11] :
      ( is_a_theorem(V_10)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_14,Y_12),equivalent(X_14,Z_11)),U_13),equivalent(equivalent(Y_12,Z_11),U_13)),V_10)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_2]) ).

tff(c_27,plain,
    ! [X_14,Z_21,Y_12,Y_23,Z_11] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(Y_23,Z_21),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_14,Y_12),equivalent(X_14,Z_11)),Y_23),equivalent(equivalent(Y_12,Z_11),Z_21)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_12]) ).

tff(c_29,plain,
    ! [Y_24,Z_25,X_26,Z_27] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(Y_24,Z_25),equivalent(equivalent(X_26,Y_24),Z_27)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_26,Z_25),Z_27)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_2]) ).

tff(c_229,plain,
    ! [U_73,X_75,Z_76,X_72,Y_74,Z_77] :
      ( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_72,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_75,Y_74),equivalent(X_75,Z_77)),U_73)),Z_76))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_72,equivalent(equivalent(Y_74,Z_77),U_73)),Z_76)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_12]) ).

tff(c_345,plain,
    ! [X_93,Z_98,X_94,U_97,Y_95,Z_96] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Z_98)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_94,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_93,Y_95),equivalent(X_93,Z_96)),U_97)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_94,equivalent(equivalent(Y_95,Z_96),U_97)),Z_98)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_229,c_2]) ).

tff(c_3517,plain,
    ! [X_312,Z_315,Z_310,Z_313,Y_311,Z_314] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Z_313)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_312,Y_311),Z_314),Z_310),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_312,Z_315),Z_314),equivalent(equivalent(Y_311,Z_315),Z_310))),Z_313)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_345]) ).

tff(c_3674,plain,
    ! [Z_315,Z_4,Y_6,U_3,X_5] : is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_5,Y_6),Z_315),U_3),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_5,Z_4),Z_315),equivalent(equivalent(Y_6,Z_4),U_3)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_3517]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).

tff(c_3677,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_3674,c_6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL098-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:15:18 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.59/2.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.59/2.38  
% 5.59/2.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.90/2.42  
% 5.90/2.42  Inference rules
% 5.90/2.42  ----------------------
% 5.90/2.42  #Ref     : 0
% 5.90/2.42  #Sup     : 868
% 5.90/2.42  #Fact    : 0
% 5.90/2.42  #Define  : 0
% 5.90/2.42  #Split   : 0
% 5.90/2.42  #Chain   : 0
% 5.90/2.42  #Close   : 0
% 5.90/2.42  
% 5.90/2.42  Ordering : KBO
% 5.90/2.42  
% 5.90/2.42  Simplification rules
% 5.90/2.42  ----------------------
% 5.90/2.42  #Subsume      : 4
% 5.90/2.42  #Demod        : 15
% 5.90/2.42  #Tautology    : 14
% 5.90/2.42  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 5.90/2.42  #BackRed      : 1
% 5.90/2.42  
% 5.90/2.42  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.90/2.42  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.90/2.42  
% 5.90/2.42  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.90/2.42  ----------------------
% 5.90/2.42  Preprocessing        : 0.39
% 5.90/2.42  Parsing              : 0.22
% 5.90/2.42  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 5.90/2.42  Main loop            : 0.97
% 5.90/2.42  Inferencing          : 0.38
% 5.90/2.42  Reduction            : 0.24
% 5.90/2.42  Demodulation         : 0.19
% 5.90/2.42  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 5.90/2.42  Subsumption          : 0.24
% 5.90/2.43  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 5.90/2.43  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.90/2.43  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.90/2.43  Total                : 1.41
% 5.90/2.43  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.90/2.43  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.90/2.43  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.90/2.43  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------