TSTP Solution File: LCL092-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LCL092-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:20:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 10.56s 10.76s
% Output   : Refutation 10.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  36 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   39 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  150 (  83 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(ic_JLukasiewicz_5,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,U)),implies(implies(U,X),implies(V,implies(Z,X))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ic_JLukasiewicz_5) ).

cnf(prove_ic_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ic_3) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(Z,U)),implies(V,implies(implies(W,Z),implies(Z,U))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,ic_JLukasiewicz_5,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,U)),implies(implies(U,X),implies(V,implies(Z,X)))),implies(implies(implies(a,b),a),a))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,ic_JLukasiewicz_5,prove_ic_3]) ).

cnf(6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(Z,implies(implies(U,V),implies(V,Z)))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,4,4]) ).

cnf(9,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,implies(implies(Z,U),implies(U,Y))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,6,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,Z)),U),implies(V,implies(Z,U)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,9,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(U,implies(V,Z)))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,13,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(Z,implies(U,implies(V,Z)))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,13,4]) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,implies(U,Y))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,18,13]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,implies(U,Y))),V),implies(W,implies(X,V)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,18,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(29,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),U),implies(V,implies(implies(implies(U,W),Z),U)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,25,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,implies(Z,implies(U,Y))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,19,13]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),U),implies(V,implies(Z,U)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,38,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(70,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(Z,implies(U,implies(V,Y)))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,43,43]) ).

cnf(75,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,implies(U,X))),implies(V,implies(W,implies(Z,implies(U,X)))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,43,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(79,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(Z,implies(U,X))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,70,43]) ).

cnf(162,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(implies(implies(Y,implies(Z,implies(U,V))),W),V),implies(Y,implies(Z,implies(U,V)))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,29,27]) ).

cnf(237,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,a)),a)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,5,29]) ).

cnf(268,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(Z,implies(U,X)))),implies(implies(V,implies(W,a)),a))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,237,79]) ).

cnf(641,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(implies(Z,U),implies(V,implies(U,U)))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,75,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(768,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(U,implies(Z,Z))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,641,27]) ).

cnf(789,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,implies(Y,Y)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,768,27]) ).

cnf(804,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(Z,implies(U,U))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,789,75]) ).

cnf(805,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,X),Y),implies(Z,implies(U,Y)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,789,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(819,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(Z,Z)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,804,27]) ).

cnf(840,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,Y))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,819,27]) ).

cnf(854,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,840,840]) ).

cnf(11102,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(Z,U))),V),U),implies(X,implies(Y,implies(Z,U))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,162,27]) ).

cnf(11221,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(X,Z))),implies(U,implies(V,implies(Y,implies(X,Z)))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,11102,27]) ).

cnf(11338,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(Z,implies(implies(implies(U,U),V),V))))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,11221,805]) ).

cnf(11486,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(implies(implies(Z,Z),U),U)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,11338,27]) ).

cnf(11606,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(implies(Y,Y),Z),Z))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,11486,840]) ).

cnf(11719,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,X),Y),Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,11606,854]) ).

cnf(11721,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,implies(implies(implies(U,U),X),Y)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,11606,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).

cnf(13077,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,11721,11719,268]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL092-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 01:03:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  "."
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T01:03:08
% 0.18/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n004.cluster.edu at 2022-07-03T01:03:08
% 10.56/10.76  
% 10.56/10.76  
% 10.56/10.76  #||
% 10.56/10.76  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.56/10.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 10.56/10.77  ||#
% 10.56/10.77  
% 10.56/10.77  ; Summary of computation:
% 10.56/10.77  ;     36375 formulas have been input or derived (from 239 formulas).
% 10.56/10.77  ;     13077 (36%) were retained.  Of these,
% 10.56/10.77  ;          471 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 10.56/10.77  ;        12606 (96%) are still being kept.
% 10.56/10.77  ; 
% 10.56/10.77  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 10.56/10.77  ;     0.001   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (3 calls)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     1.449  14%   Process new row              (29,351 calls)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     2.701  26%   Resolution                   (476 calls)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     0.239   2%   Paramodulation               (238 calls)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (1 call)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (1 call)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (1 call)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     2.514  24%   Forward simplification       (29,324 calls)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     3.275  32%   Backward simplification      (13,077 calls)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     0.118   1%   Other
% 10.56/10.77  ;    10.298        Total
% 10.56/10.77  ;    10.300        Real time
% 10.56/10.77  ; 
% 10.56/10.77  ; Term-hash-array has 31,688 terms in all.
% 10.56/10.77  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 entry (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 10.56/10.77  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 nodes (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 10.56/10.77  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1 call.
% 10.56/10.77  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1 call.
% 10.56/10.77  ; Path-index has 30,308 entries (30,308 at peak, 31,717 added, 1,409 deleted).
% 10.56/10.77  ; Path-index has 3,896 nodes (3,896 at peak, 3,982 added, 86 deleted).
% 10.56/10.77  ; Trie-index has 30,308 entries (30,308 at peak, 31,717 added, 1,409 deleted).
% 10.56/10.77  ; Trie-index has 57,207 nodes (57,207 at peak, 63,047 added, 5,840 deleted).
% 10.56/10.77  ; Retrieved 1,721,636 generalization terms in 29,321 calls.
% 10.56/10.77  ; Retrieved 747,825 instance terms in 13,075 calls.
% 10.56/10.77  ; Retrieved 8,943,764 unifiable terms in 15,787 calls.
% 10.56/10.77  ; 
% 10.56/10.77  ; The agenda of rows to process has 536 entries:
% 10.56/10.77  ;     1 with value 23             13 with value 40              25 with value 52
% 10.56/10.77  ;    16 with value 26             18 with value 41              24 with value 53
% 10.56/10.77  ;     3 with value 27             32 with value 42              36 with value 54
% 10.56/10.77  ;     1 with value 28             18 with value 43               2 with value 55
% 10.56/10.77  ;    17 with value 29             23 with value 44              15 with value 56
% 10.56/10.77  ;    14 with value 32             31 with value 45               1 with value 57
% 10.56/10.77  ;     6 with value 33             18 with value 46               2 with value 58
% 10.56/10.77  ;     4 with value 34             24 with value 47               6 with value 59
% 10.56/10.77  ;    14 with value 35             24 with value 48               2 with value 60
% 10.56/10.77  ;    16 with value 36             17 with value 49               1 with value 61
% 10.56/10.77  ;     8 with value 37             40 with value 50               1 with value 64
% 10.56/10.77  ;    18 with value 38             20 with value 51               1 with value 66
% 10.56/10.77  ;    24 with value 39
% 10.56/10.77  ; The agenda of rows to give has 12389 entries:
% 10.56/10.77  ;     2 with value (4 36)        525 with value (4 48)         581 with value (4 59)
% 10.56/10.77  ;     6 with value (4 37)        618 with value (4 49)         400 with value (4 60)
% 10.56/10.77  ;    73 with value (4 38)        639 with value (4 50)         313 with value (4 61)
% 10.56/10.77  ;    66 with value (4 39)        792 with value (4 51)         171 with value (4 62)
% 10.56/10.77  ;    90 with value (4 40)        822 with value (4 52)         114 with value (4 63)
% 10.56/10.77  ;   143 with value (4 41)        949 with value (4 53)          83 with value (4 64)
% 10.56/10.77  ;   148 with value (4 42)        866 with value (4 54)          42 with value (4 65)
% 10.56/10.77  ;   192 with value (4 43)        956 with value (4 55)          34 with value (4 66)
% 10.56/10.77  ;   256 with value (4 44)        888 with value (4 56)          33 with value (4 67)
% 10.56/10.77  ;   320 with value (4 45)        793 with value (4 57)          15 with value (4 68)
% 10.56/10.77  ;   291 with value (4 46)        688 with value (4 58)           1 with value (4 70)
% 10.56/10.77  ;   479 with value (4 47)
% 10.56/10.77  Evaluation took:
% 10.56/10.77    10.302 seconds of real time
% 10.56/10.77    10.021254 seconds of user run time
% 10.56/10.77    0.28098 seconds of system run time
% 10.56/10.77    [Run times include 1.212 seconds GC run time.]
% 10.56/10.77    0 calls to %EVAL
% 10.56/10.77    0 page faults and
% 10.56/10.77    755,040,008 bytes consed.
% 10.56/10.77  :PROOF-FOUND
% 10.56/10.77  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T01:03:18
% 10.56/10.77  :PROOF-FOUND
% 10.56/10.77  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------