TSTP Solution File: LCL090-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : LCL090-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:20:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.80s 0.99s
% Output : Refutation 0.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 21 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 95 ( 54 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X)
| is_a_theorem(Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(ic_JLukasiewicz_5,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,U)),implies(implies(U,X),implies(V,implies(Z,X))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ic_JLukasiewicz_5) ).
cnf(prove_ic_1,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ic_1) ).
cnf(4,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(Z,U)),implies(V,implies(implies(W,Z),implies(Z,U))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,ic_JLukasiewicz_5,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).
cnf(5,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,U)),implies(implies(U,X),implies(V,implies(Z,X)))),implies(a,a))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,ic_JLukasiewicz_5,prove_ic_1]) ).
cnf(6,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(Z,implies(implies(U,V),implies(V,Z)))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,4,4]) ).
cnf(9,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,implies(implies(Z,U),implies(U,Y))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,6,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).
cnf(13,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,Z)),U),implies(V,implies(Z,U)))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,9,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).
cnf(18,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(U,implies(V,Z)))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,13,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).
cnf(19,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(Z,implies(U,implies(V,Z)))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,13,4]) ).
cnf(25,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,implies(U,Y))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,18,13]) ).
cnf(27,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,implies(U,Y))),V),implies(W,implies(X,V)))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,18,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).
cnf(38,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,implies(Z,implies(U,Y))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,19,13]) ).
cnf(43,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),U),implies(V,implies(Z,U)))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,38,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).
cnf(76,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,implies(U,X))),implies(V,implies(W,implies(Z,implies(U,X)))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,43,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).
cnf(99,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,implies(U,Y)))),implies(implies(implies(implies(V,W),implies(X1,Y1)),implies(implies(Y1,V),implies(Z1,implies(X1,V)))),implies(a,a)))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,5,25]) ).
cnf(751,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(implies(Z,U),implies(V,implies(U,U)))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,76,ic_JLukasiewicz_5]) ).
cnf(891,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(U,implies(Z,Z))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,751,27]) ).
cnf(916,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,implies(Y,Y)))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,891,27]) ).
cnf(936,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(Z,implies(U,U))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,916,76]) ).
cnf(973,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,implies(Z,Z)))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,936,27]) ).
cnf(974,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[99,973]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : LCL090-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jul 2 22:22:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.49 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.49 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.49 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.49 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.49 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.49 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.49 "."
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.49 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T22:22:53
% 0.20/0.49 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n004.cluster.edu at 2022-07-02T22:22:53
% 0.80/0.99
% 0.80/0.99
% 0.80/0.99 #||
% 0.80/0.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/0.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.80/0.99 ||#
% 0.80/0.99
% 0.80/0.99 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.80/0.99 ; 3499 formulas have been input or derived (from 63 formulas).
% 0.80/0.99 ; 974 (28%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.80/0.99 ; 672 (69%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.80/0.99 ; 302 (31%) are still being kept.
% 0.80/0.99 ;
% 0.80/0.99 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.002 0% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.000 0% Assert (3 calls)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.144 29% Process new row (2,444 calls)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.086 18% Resolution (124 calls)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.019 4% Paramodulation (62 calls)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (1 call)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (1 call)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (1 call)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.063 13% Forward simplification (2,413 calls)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.141 29% Backward simplification (974 calls)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.034 7% Other
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.489 Total
% 0.80/0.99 ; 0.508 Real time
% 0.80/1.00 ;
% 0.80/1.00 ; Term-hash-array has 3,245 terms in all.
% 0.80/1.00 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 entry (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.80/1.00 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 nodes (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.80/1.00 ; Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1 call.
% 0.80/1.00 ; Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1 call.
% 0.80/1.00 ; Path-index has 1,585 entries (2,748 at peak, 3,266 added, 1,681 deleted).
% 0.80/1.00 ; Path-index has 1,551 nodes (1,578 at peak, 1,632 added, 81 deleted).
% 0.80/1.00 ; Trie-index has 1,585 entries (2,748 at peak, 3,266 added, 1,681 deleted).
% 0.80/1.00 ; Trie-index has 6,017 nodes (12,160 at peak, 14,171 added, 8,154 deleted).
% 0.80/1.00 ; Retrieved 8,281 generalization terms in 2,410 calls.
% 0.80/1.00 ; Retrieved 10,298 instance terms in 972 calls.
% 0.80/1.00 ; Retrieved 86,672 unifiable terms in 2,111 calls.
% 0.80/1.00 ;
% 0.80/1.00 ; The agenda of rows to process has 52 entries:
% 0.80/1.00 ; 5 with value 25 5 with value 33 1 with value 40
% 0.80/1.00 ; 4 with value 28 1 with value 34 1 with value 41
% 0.80/1.00 ; 4 with value 30 1 with value 35 1 with value 43
% 0.80/1.00 ; 19 with value 31 4 with value 37 1 with value 44
% 0.80/1.00 ; 4 with value 32 1 with value 38
% 0.80/1.00 ; The agenda of rows to give has 271 entries:
% 0.80/1.00 ; 1 with value (4 25) 14 with value (4 39) 15 with value (4 49)
% 0.80/1.00 ; 1 with value (4 28) 18 with value (4 40) 7 with value (4 50)
% 0.80/1.00 ; 3 with value (4 30) 20 with value (4 41) 6 with value (4 51)
% 0.80/1.00 ; 2 with value (4 31) 17 with value (4 42) 3 with value (4 52)
% 0.80/1.00 ; 4 with value (4 32) 11 with value (4 43) 3 with value (4 53)
% 0.80/1.00 ; 5 with value (4 33) 18 with value (4 44) 2 with value (4 55)
% 0.80/1.00 ; 6 with value (4 34) 20 with value (4 45) 2 with value (4 56)
% 0.80/1.00 ; 6 with value (4 35) 14 with value (4 46) 1 with value (4 57)
% 0.80/1.00 ; 10 with value (4 36) 17 with value (4 47) 1 with value (4 60)
% 0.80/1.00 ; 15 with value (4 37) 14 with value (4 48) 1 with value (4 63)
% 0.80/1.00 ; 14 with value (4 38)
% 0.80/1.00 Evaluation took:
% 0.80/1.00 0.509 seconds of real time
% 0.80/1.00 0.464182 seconds of user run time
% 0.80/1.00 0.028112 seconds of system run time
% 0.80/1.00 [Run times include 0.028 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.80/1.00 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.80/1.00 0 page faults and
% 0.80/1.00 34,225,264 bytes consed.
% 0.80/1.00 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.80/1.00 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T22:22:53
% 0.80/1.00 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.80/1.00 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------