TSTP Solution File: LCL086-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : LCL086-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:43:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.45s 1.04s
% Output   : Refutation 0.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL086-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 20:22:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.45/1.04  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.45/1.04  Process 6193 was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.45/1.04  Sat Jul  2 20:22:15 2022
% 0.45/1.04  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_6039_n013.cluster.edu".
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_6039_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.45/1.04  set(auto2).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.45/1.04      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.45/1.04      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.45/1.04      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.45/1.04  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.45/1.04  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.45/1.04  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.45/1.04  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.45/1.04  clear(print_given).
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (3 formulas)
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  Auto_denials:
% 0.45/1.04    % copying label prove_ic_1 to answer in negative clause
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.45/1.04  Function symbol KB weights:  a=1. implies=1.
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.45/1.04  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.45/1.04  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds: prove_ic_1.
% 0.45/1.04  % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.45/1.04  % Level of proof is 13.
% 0.45/1.04  % Maximum clause weight is 20.000.
% 0.45/1.04  % Given clauses 28.
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  1 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,D)),implies(E,implies(implies(D,A),implies(C,A))))) # label(ic_JLukasiewicz_4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.45/1.04  2 -is_a_theorem(implies(a,a)) # label(prove_ic_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_ic_1).  [assumption].
% 0.45/1.04  3 -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | -is_a_theorem(A) | is_a_theorem(B) # label(condensed_detachment) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.45/1.04  4 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(implies(B,C),implies(D,C)),implies(C,E)),implies(F,implies(C,E))))).  [hyper(3,a,1,a,b,1,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  5 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),implies(B,D)),implies(E,implies(B,D)))).  [hyper(3,a,4,a,b,4,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  7 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),implies(C,implies(B,C))))).  [hyper(3,a,5,a,b,5,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  10 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(B,implies(A,B)))).  [hyper(3,a,7,a,b,7,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  12 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,C),B),implies(C,B)))).  [hyper(3,a,1,a,b,10,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  32 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),implies(B,A))).  [hyper(3,a,12,a,b,12,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  37 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,B)))).  [hyper(3,a,5,a,b,32,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  52 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).  [hyper(3,a,37,a,b,37,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  58 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,C),B),implies(D,B)))).  [hyper(3,a,1,a,b,52,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  126 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),implies(C,A))).  [hyper(3,a,58,a,b,58,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  129 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,B))).  [hyper(3,a,126,a,b,126,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  134 is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)).  [hyper(3,a,129,a,b,129,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  135 $F # answer(prove_ic_1).  [resolve(134,a,2,a)].
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  Given=28. Generated=514. Kept=134. proofs=1.
% 0.45/1.04  Usable=23. Sos=79. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=34. Hints=0.
% 0.45/1.04  Megabytes=0.15.
% 0.45/1.04  User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.45/1.04  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.45/1.04  
% 0.45/1.04  Process 6193 exit (max_proofs) Sat Jul  2 20:22:15 2022
% 0.45/1.04  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------