TSTP Solution File: LCL085-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL085-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:27:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 52.40s 52.65s
% Output : Refutation 52.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : LCL085-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 09:46:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37 Mon Jul 4 09:46:26 2022
% 0.13/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11569.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.37 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.37 in usable.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 3
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 4
% 0.13/0.39 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.13/0.39 distinct function count: 1
% 0.13/0.39 distinct constant count: 2
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Changing weight limit from 60 to 42.
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Model 7 [ 2 1 786 ] (0.00 seconds, 19060 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Model 8 [ 4 0 135 ] (0.00 seconds, 13039 Inserts)
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.44/6.71 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 435 givens.
% 6.44/6.71
% 6.60/6.86
% 6.60/6.86
% 6.60/6.86 Changing weight limit from 42 to 36.
% 6.60/6.86
% 6.60/6.86 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 440 givens.
% 6.60/6.86
% 6.73/6.97
% 6.73/6.97
% 6.73/6.97 Changing weight limit from 36 to 34.
% 6.73/6.97
% 6.73/6.97 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 445 givens.
% 6.73/6.97
% 6.83/7.09
% 6.83/7.09
% 6.83/7.09 Changing weight limit from 34 to 32.
% 6.83/7.09
% 6.83/7.09 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 450 givens.
% 6.83/7.09
% 7.81/8.00
% 7.81/8.00
% 7.81/8.00 Changing weight limit from 32 to 30.
% 7.81/8.00
% 7.81/8.00 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 455 givens.
% 7.81/8.00
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 51.51 sec ----> 25568 [binary,25567.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 Length of proof is 48. Level of proof is 26.
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 52.40/52.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 52.40/52.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 1 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 52.40/52.65 2 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(implies(a,b),b))).
% 52.40/52.65 3 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(implies(C,A),implies(D,A)))).
% 52.40/52.65 4 [hyper,3,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),implies(B,D)),implies(E,implies(B,D)))).
% 52.40/52.65 5 [hyper,4,1,4] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),implies(C,implies(B,C))))).
% 52.40/52.65 6 [hyper,4,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(D,B),implies(E,B))),implies(F,implies(implies(D,B),implies(E,B))))).
% 52.40/52.65 7 [hyper,5,1,5] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(B,implies(A,B)))).
% 52.40/52.65 9 [hyper,7,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,A)),B),implies(C,B))).
% 52.40/52.65 19 [hyper,6,1,9] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),implies(C,C)))).
% 52.40/52.65 20 [hyper,6,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,C),B),implies(D,B)))).
% 52.40/52.65 21 [hyper,19,1,19] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(B,B))).
% 52.40/52.65 24 [hyper,21,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,A),B),implies(C,B))).
% 52.40/52.65 25 [hyper,21,1,9] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(A,B))).
% 52.40/52.65 27 [hyper,25,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),implies(C,A))).
% 52.40/52.65 30 [hyper,24,1,4] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,B)))).
% 52.40/52.65 37 [hyper,30,1,30] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 52.40/52.65 39 [hyper,27,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(B,C)),implies(D,implies(B,C)))).
% 52.40/52.65 42 [hyper,37,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),B),implies(D,B))).
% 52.40/52.65 50 [hyper,20,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),implies(C,A)),D),implies(E,D))).
% 52.40/52.65 54 [hyper,39,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(D,B)),implies(E,implies(D,B)))).
% 52.40/52.65 75 [hyper,54,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(D,implies(C,E))),implies(F,implies(D,implies(C,E))))).
% 52.40/52.65 76 [hyper,54,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(implies(B,C),D),C),implies(B,C)))).
% 52.40/52.65 79 [hyper,76,1,76] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),B),implies(A,B))).
% 52.40/52.65 84 [hyper,79,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(A,B),C)),implies(D,implies(implies(A,B),C)))).
% 52.40/52.65 161 [hyper,84,1,42] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,implies(C,D)),C),C))).
% 52.40/52.65 164 [hyper,84,1,27] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,C),B),B))).
% 52.40/52.65 169 [hyper,164,1,164] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),A)).
% 52.40/52.65 175 [hyper,169,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(C,implies(A,B)))).
% 52.40/52.65 189 [hyper,161,1,169] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),B),B)).
% 52.40/52.65 192 [hyper,189,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,implies(A,C))),implies(D,implies(B,implies(A,C))))).
% 52.40/52.65 201 [hyper,175,1,175] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,implies(B,C)),implies(B,C)))).
% 52.40/52.65 215 [hyper,201,1,201] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B))).
% 52.40/52.65 236 [hyper,215,1,50] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),implies(C,A)),D),D)).
% 52.40/52.65 272 [hyper,75,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,C),D),implies(C,D)))).
% 52.40/52.65 274 [hyper,272,1,272] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(B,C))).
% 52.40/52.65 281 [hyper,274,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)))).
% 52.40/52.65 332 [hyper,281,1,281] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B))),D),implies(E,D))).
% 52.40/52.65 339 [hyper,281,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(D,C)),A),implies(E,A))).
% 52.40/52.65 933 [hyper,192,1,215] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,implies(A,C))),implies(B,implies(A,C)))).
% 52.40/52.65 945 [hyper,933,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(implies(B,C),A),B))).
% 52.40/52.65 959 [hyper,945,1,236] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(implies(B,D),B)),implies(A,B))).
% 52.40/52.65 992 [hyper,945,1,281] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),A),implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)))).
% 52.40/52.65 1007 [hyper,945,1,175] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),D),implies(B,implies(B,C))),implies(A,implies(B,C)))).
% 52.40/52.65 1031 [hyper,945,1,42] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(implies(D,implies(B,E)),B)),implies(A,B))).
% 52.40/52.65 1449 [hyper,332,1,215] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B))),D),D)).
% 52.40/52.65 1491 [hyper,339,1,215] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(D,C)),A),A)).
% 52.40/52.65 3896 [hyper,1031,1,1491] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),D)),implies(B,C)),E),C),implies(B,C))).
% 52.40/52.65 25025 [hyper,3896,1,959] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(B,C),B),D)),implies(implies(B,C),B)),B)).
% 52.40/52.65 25042 [hyper,25025,1,992] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(implies(A,C),A),B))).
% 52.40/52.65 25120 [hyper,25042,1,1449] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),implies(implies(A,C),implies(D,C)))).
% 52.40/52.65 25567 [hyper,25120,1,1007] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),B))).
% 52.40/52.65 25568 [binary,25567.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 % SZS output end Refutation
% 52.40/52.65 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 ============ end of search ============
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 true clauses given 91 (5.7%)
% 52.40/52.65 false clauses given 1511
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 FALSE TRUE
% 52.40/52.65 14 2 0
% 52.40/52.65 16 7 0
% 52.40/52.65 18 12 0
% 52.40/52.65 20 715 27
% 52.40/52.65 22 1777 36
% 52.40/52.65 24 46 35
% 52.40/52.65 26 51 32
% 52.40/52.65 28 67 30
% 52.40/52.65 30 66 27
% 52.40/52.65 tot: 2743 187 (6.4% true)
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 Model 8 [ 4 0 135 ] (0.01 seconds, 13039 Inserts)
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 52.40/52.65
% 52.40/52.65 Process 11569 finished Mon Jul 4 09:47:19 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------