TSTP Solution File: LCL082-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL082-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:34:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  17 unt;   0 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(u)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,v))
    | is_a_theorem(v) ),
    file('LCL082-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),w),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(w,u),implies__dfg(x,u)))),
    file('LCL082-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(a,implies__dfg(b,a))),
    file('LCL082-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),w))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(w,u),implies__dfg(x,u))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(w,v)),implies__dfg(v,x)),implies__dfg(y,implies__dfg(v,x)))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[7,2]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:7.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(v,w)),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(x,v),implies__dfg(y,v))),implies__dfg(z,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(x,v),implies__dfg(y,v))))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[7,8]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:7.0,8.0')] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(w,v)),implies__dfg(v,x)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(y,implies__dfg(v,x))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:8.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,w),implies__dfg(w,implies__dfg(v,w))))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[10,8]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:10.0,8.0')] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(u)
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,w),implies__dfg(w,implies__dfg(v,w)))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[11,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:11.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(v,implies__dfg(u,v)))),
    inference(ems,[status(thm)],[14,11]),
    [iquote('0:EmS:14.0,11.0')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(v,u)),v),implies__dfg(w,v))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[7,15]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:7.0,15.0')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,v),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(w,v),implies__dfg(v,v))))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[10,9]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:10.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(v,w)),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(x,v),implies__dfg(y,v))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(z,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(x,v),implies__dfg(y,v)))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:9.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(36,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(u)
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,v),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(w,v),implies__dfg(v,v)))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[20,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:20.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(40,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,u),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,u),implies__dfg(u,u)))),
    inference(ems,[status(thm)],[36,20]),
    [iquote('0:EmS:36.0,20.0')] ).

cnf(49,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(v,v)),v),implies__dfg(w,v))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[7,40]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:7.0,40.0')] ).

cnf(61,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,w),implies__dfg(w,w)))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[22,49]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:22.0,49.0')] ).

cnf(73,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(u)
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,w),implies__dfg(w,w))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[61,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:61.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(74,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(v,v))),
    inference(ems,[status(thm)],[73,61]),
    [iquote('0:EmS:73.0,61.0')] ).

cnf(84,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,u),v),implies__dfg(w,v))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[7,74]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:7.0,74.0')] ).

cnf(86,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,v))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(v,v)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[74,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:74.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(93,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(u,v))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[86,18]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:86.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(109,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(v,implies__dfg(w,v)))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[10,84]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:10.0,84.0')] ).

cnf(120,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(u)
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(v,implies__dfg(w,v))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[109,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:109.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(121,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(v,u))),
    inference(ems,[status(thm)],[120,93]),
    [iquote('0:EmS:120.0,93.0')] ).

cnf(131,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[121,3]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:121.0,3.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : LCL082-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 17:26:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS derived 124 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 74 clauses.
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS allocated 75847 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.07 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 14, length 26 :
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : condensed_detachment ic_JLukasiewicz prove_ic_2
% 0.20/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------