TSTP Solution File: LCL077-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LCL077-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:20:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.69s 0.88s
% Output   : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (   0 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(cn_18,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_18) ).

cnf(cn_35,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_35) ).

cnf(cn_49,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X),not(Y)),implies(Y,X))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_49) ).

cnf(prove_cn_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_39) ).

cnf(10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(implies(not(Y),not(Z)),implies(Z,Y)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,cn_49,cn_18]) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,X))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,cn_35,cn_18]) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,12,cn_18]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,X),implies(not(not(a)),a))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,20,prove_cn_39]) ).

cnf(170,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(not(Y),not(Z))),implies(X,implies(Z,Y)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,10,cn_35]) ).

cnf(184,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),implies(not(not(a)),a))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,26,cn_35]) ).

cnf(1448,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(X),implies(X,Y))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,170,cn_18]) ).

cnf(1451,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,170,184]),1448]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL077-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 12:47:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.43  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.44  * 
% 0.17/0.44  * 
% 0.17/0.45  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.17/0.45  * 
% 0.17/0.45  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.17/0.45  * 
% 0.17/0.45  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.17/0.45   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.17/0.45   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.17/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.17/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.17/0.45   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.17/0.45   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.17/0.45   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.17/0.45   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.17/0.45   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.17/0.45   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.17/0.45   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.17/0.45   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.17/0.45  * 
% 0.17/0.45  "."
% 0.17/0.45  * 
% 0.17/0.45  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T12:47:03
% 0.17/0.45  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-07-03T12:47:03
% 0.69/0.88  
% 0.69/0.88  
% 0.69/0.88  #||
% 0.69/0.88  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/0.88  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.69/0.88  ||#
% 0.69/0.88  
% 0.69/0.88  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.69/0.88  ;      2863 formulas have been input or derived (from 81 formulas).
% 0.69/0.88  ;      1451 (51%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.69/0.88  ;            4 ( 0%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.69/0.88  ;         1447 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.69/0.88  ; 
% 0.69/0.88  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.001   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (5 calls)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.171  40%   Process new row              (2,404 calls)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.090  21%   Resolution                   (160 calls)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.009   2%   Paramodulation               (80 calls)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (1 call)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (1 call)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (1 call)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.077  18%   Forward simplification       (2,403 calls)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.041  10%   Backward simplification      (1,451 calls)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.039   9%   Other
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.428        Total
% 0.69/0.88  ;     0.433        Real time
% 0.69/0.88  ; 
% 0.69/0.88  ; Term-hash-array has 3,416 terms in all.
% 0.69/0.88  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 entry (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.69/0.88  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 nodes (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.69/0.88  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1 call.
% 0.69/0.88  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1 call.
% 0.69/0.88  ; Path-index has 3,408 entries (3,408 at peak, 3,417 added, 9 deleted).
% 0.69/0.88  ; Path-index has 877 nodes (877 at peak, 877 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.69/0.88  ; Trie-index has 3,408 entries (3,408 at peak, 3,417 added, 9 deleted).
% 0.69/0.88  ; Trie-index has 7,350 nodes (7,350 at peak, 7,380 added, 30 deleted).
% 0.69/0.88  ; Retrieved 27,281 generalization terms in 2,401 calls.
% 0.69/0.88  ; Retrieved 4,415 instance terms in 1,449 calls.
% 0.69/0.88  ; Retrieved 143,249 unifiable terms in 1,732 calls.
% 0.69/0.88  ; 
% 0.69/0.88  ; The agenda of rows to process has 79 entries:
% 0.69/0.88  ;     2 with value 23              3 with value 29               5 with value 34
% 0.69/0.88  ;     9 with value 24              1 with value 30               8 with value 35
% 0.69/0.88  ;     6 with value 25              5 with value 31              13 with value 36
% 0.69/0.88  ;     1 with value 26              2 with value 32               9 with value 37
% 0.69/0.88  ;     1 with value 27              8 with value 33               2 with value 38
% 0.69/0.88  ;     4 with value 28
% 0.69/0.88  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1367 entries:
% 0.69/0.88  ;     1 with value (4 13)         84 with value (4 26)         116 with value (4 33)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     1 with value (4 20)         73 with value (4 27)         147 with value (4 34)
% 0.69/0.88  ;     5 with value (4 21)         86 with value (4 28)          81 with value (4 35)
% 0.69/0.88  ;    26 with value (4 22)        108 with value (4 29)          42 with value (4 36)
% 0.69/0.88  ;    42 with value (4 23)        132 with value (4 30)          18 with value (4 37)
% 0.69/0.88  ;    58 with value (4 24)        122 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 38)
% 0.69/0.88  ;    45 with value (4 25)        179 with value (4 32)
% 0.69/0.88  Evaluation took:
% 0.69/0.88    0.433 seconds of real time
% 0.69/0.88    0.408421 seconds of user run time
% 0.69/0.88    0.020938 seconds of system run time
% 0.69/0.88    [Run times include 0.018 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.69/0.88    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.69/0.88    0 page faults and
% 0.69/0.88    24,861,632 bytes consed.
% 0.69/0.88  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.69/0.88  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T12:47:04
% 0.69/0.88  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.69/0.88  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------