TSTP Solution File: LCL068-1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LCL068-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:52:03 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.85s 0.93s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  20 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   64 (  34   ~;  30   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   3   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   91 (  22 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    a: $i ).

cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(cn_59,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(implies(X3,X2),implies(implies(X1,X3),X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_59) ).

cnf(cn_37,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(not(X1),X3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_37) ).

cnf(cn_19,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_19) ).

cnf(prove_cn_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),a),a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_2) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    condensed_detachment ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(implies(X3,X2),implies(implies(X1,X3),X2)))),
    cn_59 ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X3,X1),X2)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X3),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(not(X1),X3))),
    cn_37 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X3),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3))),
    cn_19 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),implies(X2,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X1),X4))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X4,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X1),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X1,X2)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X1),X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X1)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_22]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),implies(not(X1),X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X1,not(X2))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,implies(X1,not(X2)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(implies(X2,X1)),X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),not(X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),a),a)),
    prove_cn_2 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X1)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : LCL068-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 06:22:25 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.53  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.85/0.93  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.85/0.93  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.85/0.93  % Proof found
% 0.85/0.93  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.85/0.93  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.85/0.94  % Total time : 0.391000 s
% 0.85/0.94  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.85/0.94  % Total time : 0.394000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------