TSTP Solution File: LCL065-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL065-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RyOTN8rwXv true

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:58:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.30s 0.85s
% Output   : Refutation 1.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL065-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RyOTN8rwXv true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 03:26:20 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.34  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.68/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.68/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.68/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.68/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.30/0.85  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.30/0.85  % BCE start: 5
% 1.30/0.85  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.30/0.85  % PE start: 5
% 1.30/0.85  logic: neq
% 1.30/0.85  % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.30/0.85  % done 144 iterations in 0.149s
% 1.30/0.85  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.30/0.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.30/0.85  thf(not_type, type, not: $i > $i).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(prove_cn_2, conjecture,
% 1.30/0.85    (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ a ) @ a ) @ a ))).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.30/0.85    (~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ a ) @ a ) @ a ) )),
% 1.30/0.85    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_cn_2])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ a) @ a) @ a))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(cn_49, axiom,
% 1.30/0.85    (is_a_theorem @
% 1.30/0.85     ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ ( not @ Y ) ) @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.30/0.85           (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ X1)) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_49])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(cn_18, axiom, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_18])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 1.30/0.85    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | 
% 1.30/0.85     ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.30/0.85          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0) |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.30/0.85           (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ X1)) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_49])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0) |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_18])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(cn_35, axiom,
% 1.30/0.85    (is_a_theorem @
% 1.30/0.85     ( implies @
% 1.30/0.85       ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) ) @ 
% 1.30/0.85       ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.30/0.85           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)) @ 
% 1.30/0.85            (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_35])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.30/0.85          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.30/0.85              (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.30/0.85          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 1.30/0.85          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.30/0.85             (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.30/0.85              (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 1.30/0.85          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 1.30/0.85          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.30/0.85               (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ 
% 1.30/0.85                (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X3)))
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl55, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.30/0.85             (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X1) @ 
% 1.30/0.85              (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0) @ X2)))
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X1) @ X2)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl424, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X2) @ X1) @ X0))
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X2) @ X2) @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl55])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl479, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.30/0.85           (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl424])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.30/0.85             (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))
% 1.30/0.85          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl546, plain,
% 1.30/0.85      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.85          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl479, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 1.30/0.85  thf(zip_derived_cl593, plain, ($false),
% 1.30/0.85      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl546])).
% 1.30/0.85  
% 1.30/0.85  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.30/0.85  
% 1.30/0.85  
% 1.30/0.86  % Terminating...
% 1.47/0.94  % Runner terminated.
% 1.47/0.95  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------