TSTP Solution File: LCL065-1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LCL065-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:52:03 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.87s 0.96s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  17 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   64 (  33   ~;  31   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   3   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   88 (  16 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    a: $i ).

cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(cn_35,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_35) ).

cnf(cn_18,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_18) ).

cnf(cn_49,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_49) ).

cnf(prove_cn_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),a),a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_2) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    condensed_detachment ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X3)))),
    cn_35 ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    cn_18 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X3,X2)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    cn_49 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X3),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),not(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X1)),X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X3),not(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X1)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,not(not(X2))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X1),X2),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(not(X2))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,X2),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,implies(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X2),X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X3),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),implies(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X3),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(a),a),a)),
    prove_cn_2 ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL065-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 03:46:27 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.55  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.87/0.96  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.87/0.96  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/0.96  % Proof found
% 0.87/0.96  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/0.96  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.87/0.96  % Total time : 0.403000 s
% 0.87/0.96  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.87/0.96  % Total time : 0.405000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------