TSTP Solution File: LCL057-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL057-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LkhALuccso true
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:57:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 79.03s 11.89s
% Output : Refutation 79.03s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL057-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LkhALuccso true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 05:24:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 79.03/11.89 % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 79.03/11.89 % done 5999 iterations in 11.093s
% 79.03/11.89 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 79.03/11.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% 79.03/11.89 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(not_type, type, not: $i > $i).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(prove_cn_40, conjecture,
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ a @ ( not @ ( not @ a ) ) ))).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 79.03/11.89 (~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ a @ ( not @ ( not @ a ) ) ) )),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_cn_40])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ a @ (not @ (not @ a))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(cn_2, axiom,
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ X ) @ X ))).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(cn_3, axiom,
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ) ))).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_3])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 79.03/11.89 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) |
% 79.03/11.89 ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0)) | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(cn_1, axiom,
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 ( implies @
% 79.03/11.89 ( implies @ X @ Y ) @
% 79.03/11.89 ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X1)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X2) @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X2))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_3])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0) @ X2) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X2) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl78, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X1)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl14, zip_derived_cl15])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl82, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X1)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0) @ X3) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ X2 @ X3))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl78, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X1) @ X0) @ X2) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl150, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X2) @ X2) @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl554, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X2)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl82, zip_derived_cl150])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X1) @ X0) @ X2) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @
% 79.03/11.89 X3) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl57, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X3) @ (implies @ X2 @ X3)) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl153, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ (not @ X2) @ X2)) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl57])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl4361, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ (not @ X2) @ X2))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl153, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl4431, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X1)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X2) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl554, zip_derived_cl4361])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl11338, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X2)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4431, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl11451, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0)) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl11338])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl57, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X3) @ (implies @ X2 @ X3)) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl16956, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11451, zip_derived_cl57])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl18176, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0)) @ X0))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl16956])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0) @ X2) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl57, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X3) @ (implies @ X2 @ X3)) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl72, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (not @ X2)) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl57])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl90, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ X3) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (not @ X2)) @ X3)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl72, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl1257, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ (not @ X1)) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X3)) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl90, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl19164, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ (not @ X0))) @ X0))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)],
% 79.03/11.89 [zip_derived_cl18176, zip_derived_cl1257])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X2) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i]: (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X0))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl15])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl11338, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X2)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4431, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl11411, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl11338])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl57, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X3) @ (implies @ X2 @ X3)) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl11607, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11411, zip_derived_cl57])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl12182, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0)) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl11607])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl72, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (not @ X2)) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl57])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X2) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl92, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl72, zip_derived_cl15])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl94, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0)) @ X3) @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ X1 @ X3)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl92, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.89 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl253, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 79.03/11.89 | ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.89 (implies @ (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X2)) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl94, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl31414, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.89 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12182, zip_derived_cl253])).
% 79.03/11.89 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 79.03/11.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.89 ( (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.90 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 79.03/11.90 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl31619, plain,
% 79.03/11.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.90 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.90 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2) @
% 79.03/11.90 (implies @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl31414, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.90 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.90 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.90 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl37317, plain,
% 79.03/11.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.90 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 79.03/11.90 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl31619, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl37804, plain,
% 79.03/11.90 (![X0 : $i]: (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ (not @ X0)) @ X0))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)],
% 79.03/11.90 [zip_derived_cl19164, zip_derived_cl37317])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl12182, plain,
% 79.03/11.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.90 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.90 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0)) @
% 79.03/11.90 (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl11607])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl1257, plain,
% 79.03/11.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.90 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ (not @ X1)) @ X0))
% 79.03/11.90 | ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.90 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X3)) @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl90, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl31429, plain,
% 79.03/11.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.90 (is_a_theorem @
% 79.03/11.90 (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ X1)) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)],
% 79.03/11.90 [zip_derived_cl12182, zip_derived_cl1257])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 79.03/11.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.90 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 79.03/11.90 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 79.03/11.90 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl36542, plain,
% 79.03/11.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 79.03/11.90 ( (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 79.03/11.90 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ X1))))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl31429, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl38010, plain,
% 79.03/11.90 (![X0 : $i]: (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (not @ (not @ X0))))),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)],
% 79.03/11.90 [zip_derived_cl37804, zip_derived_cl36542])).
% 79.03/11.90 thf(zip_derived_cl38040, plain, ($false),
% 79.03/11.90 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl38010])).
% 79.03/11.90
% 79.03/11.90 % SZS output end Refutation
% 79.03/11.90
% 79.03/11.90
% 79.03/11.90 % Terminating...
% 79.42/12.00 % Runner terminated.
% 79.42/12.02 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------