TSTP Solution File: LCL054-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL054-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:27:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 299.35s 299.55s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : LCL054-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 20:38:44 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.37  Mon Jul  4 20:38:44 2022
% 0.14/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 2612.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.14/0.37  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.14/0.37  in usable.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.14/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 5
% 0.14/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 40
% 0.14/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.14/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.14/0.39     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.14/0.39     distinct function count: 2
% 0.14/0.39     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Model 4 [ 1 0 407 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Model 5 [ 1 0 423 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Model 6 [ 5 2 8136 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.53/9.73  
% 9.53/9.73  Resetting weight limit to 59 after 175 givens.
% 9.53/9.73  
% 10.36/10.56  
% 10.36/10.56  
% 10.36/10.56  Changing weight limit from 59 to 28.
% 10.36/10.56  
% 10.36/10.56  Resetting weight limit to 28 after 240 givens.
% 10.36/10.56  
% 10.65/10.90  
% 10.65/10.90  
% 10.65/10.90  Changing weight limit from 28 to 25.
% 10.65/10.90  
% 10.65/10.90  Resetting weight limit to 25 after 250 givens.
% 10.65/10.90  
% 10.74/10.96  
% 10.74/10.96  
% 10.74/10.96  Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 10.74/10.96  
% 10.74/10.96  Resetting weight limit to 24 after 255 givens.
% 10.74/10.96  
% 10.74/10.97  
% 10.74/10.97  
% 10.74/10.97  Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 10.74/10.97  
% 10.74/10.97  Resetting weight limit to 23 after 260 givens.
% 10.74/10.97  
% 10.82/11.02  
% 10.82/11.02  
% 10.82/11.02  Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 10.82/11.02  
% 10.82/11.02  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 265 givens.
% 10.82/11.02  
% 10.82/11.05  
% 10.82/11.05  
% 10.82/11.05  Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 10.82/11.05  
% 10.82/11.05  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 270 givens.
% 10.82/11.05  
% 11.06/11.25  
% 11.06/11.25  
% 11.06/11.25  Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 11.06/11.25  
% 11.06/11.25  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 300 givens.
% 11.06/11.25  
% 11.18/11.39  
% 11.18/11.39  
% 11.18/11.39  Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 11.18/11.39  
% 11.18/11.39  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 330 givens.
% 11.18/11.39  
% 11.26/11.50  
% 11.26/11.50  
% 11.26/11.50  Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 11.26/11.50  
% 11.26/11.50  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 350 givens.
% 11.26/11.50  
% 11.50/11.71  
% 11.50/11.71  
% 11.50/11.71  Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 11.50/11.71  
% 11.50/11.71  Resetting weight limit to 17 after 395 givens.
% 11.50/11.71  
% 11.79/11.97  
% 11.79/11.97  
% 11.79/11.97  Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 11.79/11.97  
% 11.79/11.97  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 11.79/11.97  
% 11.79/11.97  
% 11.79/11.97  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 450 givens.
% 11.79/11.97  
% 12.18/12.37  
% 12.18/12.37  
% 12.18/12.37  Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 12.18/12.37  
% 12.18/12.37  Resetting weight limit to 15 after 600 givens.
% 12.18/12.37  
% 13.06/13.26  
% 13.06/13.26  
% 13.06/13.26  Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 13.06/13.26  
% 13.06/13.26  Resetting weight limit to 14 after 915 givens.
% 13.06/13.26  
% 42.47/42.67  
% 42.47/42.67  
% 42.47/42.67  Changing weight limit from 14 to 15.
% 42.47/42.67  
% 42.47/42.67  Resetting weight limit to 15 after 6120 givens.
% 42.47/42.67  
% 299.35/299.55  
% 299.35/299.55  
% 299.35/299.55  Changing weight limit from 15 to 16.
% 299.35/299.55  
% 299.35/299.55  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 18265 givens.
% 299.35/299.55  
% 300.04/300.21  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------