TSTP Solution File: LCL051-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL051-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:27:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 29.52s 29.71s
% Output : Refutation 29.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : LCL051-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 06:12:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Mon Jul 4 06:12:01 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23197.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.12/0.36 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.36 in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 5
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 40
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.19/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.19/0.38 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.19/0.38 distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.38 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Changing weight limit from 60 to 46.
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Model 4 [ 1 1 62 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Model 5 [ 1 0 204 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Model 6 [ 2 2 12621 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Model 7 [ 2 1 1026 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Model 8 [ 3 4 25534 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Model 9 [ 3 0 936 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Model 10 [ 7 2 12860 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 14.88/15.08
% 14.88/15.08 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 125 givens.
% 14.88/15.08
% 18.97/19.16
% 18.97/19.16
% 18.97/19.16 Changing weight limit from 46 to 47.
% 18.97/19.16
% 18.97/19.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.97/19.16
% 18.97/19.16 Model 11 [ 4 1 312 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.97/19.16
% 18.97/19.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 18.97/19.16
% 18.97/19.16 Model 12 [ 4 1 343 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 18.97/19.16
% 18.97/19.16 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 140 givens.
% 18.97/19.16
% 18.97/19.18
% 18.97/19.18
% 18.97/19.18 Changing weight limit from 47 to 48.
% 18.97/19.18
% 18.97/19.18 Resetting weight limit to 48 after 145 givens.
% 18.97/19.18
% 19.01/19.20
% 19.01/19.20
% 19.01/19.20 Changing weight limit from 48 to 49.
% 19.01/19.20
% 19.01/19.20 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 150 givens.
% 19.01/19.20
% 19.01/19.22
% 19.01/19.22
% 19.01/19.22 Changing weight limit from 49 to 42.
% 19.01/19.22
% 19.01/19.22 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 155 givens.
% 19.01/19.22
% 21.78/21.99
% 21.78/21.99
% 21.78/21.99 Changing weight limit from 42 to 41.
% 21.78/21.99
% 21.78/21.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.78/21.99
% 21.78/21.99 Model 13 [ 6 1 812 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 21.78/21.99
% 21.78/21.99 Resetting weight limit to 41 after 255 givens.
% 21.78/21.99
% 21.87/22.10
% 21.87/22.10
% 21.87/22.10 Changing weight limit from 41 to 40.
% 21.87/22.10
% 21.87/22.10 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 265 givens.
% 21.87/22.10
% 23.49/23.67
% 23.49/23.67
% 23.49/23.67 Changing weight limit from 40 to 33.
% 23.49/23.67
% 23.49/23.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 23.49/23.67
% 23.49/23.67 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 270 givens.
% 23.49/23.67
% 23.54/23.73
% 23.54/23.73
% 23.54/23.73 Changing weight limit from 33 to 26.
% 23.54/23.73
% 23.54/23.73 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 275 givens.
% 23.54/23.73
% 23.64/23.88
% 23.64/23.88
% 23.64/23.88 Changing weight limit from 26 to 22.
% 23.64/23.88
% 23.64/23.88 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 280 givens.
% 23.64/23.88
% 23.71/23.96
% 23.71/23.96
% 23.71/23.96 Changing weight limit from 22 to 20.
% 23.71/23.96
% 23.71/23.96 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 285 givens.
% 23.71/23.96
% 26.85/27.11
% 26.85/27.11
% 26.85/27.11 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 26.85/27.11
% 26.85/27.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.85/27.11
% 26.85/27.11 Model 14 [ 7 2 9965 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.85/27.11
% 26.85/27.11 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 26.85/27.11
% 26.85/27.11
% 26.85/27.11 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 505 givens.
% 26.85/27.11
% 27.16/27.35
% 27.16/27.35
% 27.16/27.35 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 27.16/27.35
% 27.16/27.35 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 540 givens.
% 27.16/27.35
% 27.78/28.02
% 27.78/28.02
% 27.78/28.02 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 27.78/28.02
% 27.78/28.02 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 650 givens.
% 27.78/28.02
% 29.07/29.34
% 29.07/29.34
% 29.07/29.34 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 29.07/29.34
% 29.07/29.34 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 965 givens.
% 29.07/29.34
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 29.15 sec ----> 58196 [binary,58195.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 Length of proof is 24. Level of proof is 13.
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 29.52/29.71 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 29.52/29.71 % SZS output start Refutation
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 1 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 29.52/29.71 2 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(b,c),implies(implies(a,b),implies(a,c)))).
% 29.52/29.71 3 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))).
% 29.52/29.71 4 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A)).
% 29.52/29.71 5 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))).
% 29.52/29.71 6 [hyper,3,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),implies(implies(C,A),D))).
% 29.52/29.71 7 [hyper,4,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(not(A),A),B))).
% 29.52/29.71 9 [hyper,5,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(A,C))).
% 29.52/29.71 12 [hyper,7,1,7] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(A,B)),implies(A,B)),implies(implies(not(A),A),B))).
% 29.52/29.71 17 [hyper,7,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(A,B)),implies(A,B)),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))).
% 29.52/29.71 21 [hyper,6,1,7] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)),implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)),implies(implies(C,A),D))).
% 29.52/29.71 22 [hyper,6,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(D,B),implies(A,implies(D,C))))).
% 29.52/29.71 29 [hyper,9,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,implies(A,C)))).
% 29.52/29.71 34 [hyper,9,1,4] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)).
% 29.52/29.71 36 [hyper,34,1,5] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B)).
% 29.52/29.71 64 [hyper,29,1,9] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(not(A),C)))).
% 29.52/29.71 68 [hyper,29,1,36] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(implies(B,B)),C))).
% 29.52/29.71 78 [hyper,64,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),C)),D),implies(B,D))).
% 29.52/29.71 97 [hyper,68,1,3] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B),C),implies(D,C))).
% 29.52/29.71 1361 [hyper,97,1,12] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),B),B))).
% 29.52/29.71 1377 [hyper,1361,1,22] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),B)),implies(C,implies(A,B)))).
% 29.52/29.71 1389 [hyper,1377,1,1377] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,implies(not(C),C)),implies(B,C)))).
% 29.52/29.71 1397 [hyper,1377,1,78] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,A)))).
% 29.52/29.71 1449 [hyper,1397,1,1377] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,B)))).
% 29.52/29.71 1569 [hyper,1449,1,17] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(B,C))).
% 29.52/29.71 29173 [hyper,1389,1,21] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),implies(implies(B,A),A))).
% 29.52/29.71 29217 [hyper,29173,1,1569] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),B))).
% 29.52/29.71 29532 [hyper,29217,1,22] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(B,implies(A,C)))).
% 29.52/29.71 58195 [hyper,29532,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,A),implies(C,B)))).
% 29.52/29.71 58196 [binary,58195.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 % SZS output end Refutation
% 29.52/29.71 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 ============ end of search ============
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 true clauses given 214 (20.2%)
% 29.52/29.71 false clauses given 843
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 FALSE TRUE
% 29.52/29.71 12 156 168
% 29.52/29.71 13 997 332
% 29.52/29.71 14 1346 561
% 29.52/29.71 15 4 784
% 29.52/29.71 16 10 654
% 29.52/29.71 tot: 2513 2499 (49.9% true)
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 Model 14 [ 7 2 9965 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 29.52/29.71
% 29.52/29.71 Process 23197 finished Mon Jul 4 06:12:30 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------