TSTP Solution File: LCL046-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL046-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K1B8bPy250 true

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:57:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.98s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL046-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K1B8bPy250 true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 05:55:38 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.65  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.98/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.98/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.98/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.98/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.98/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.98/0.76  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.98/0.76  % BCE start: 5
% 0.98/0.76  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.98/0.76  % PE start: 5
% 0.98/0.76  logic: neq
% 0.98/0.76  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.98/0.76  % done 13 iterations in 0.011s
% 0.98/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.98/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.98/0.76  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(not_type, type, not: $i > $i).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(prove_cn_16, conjecture, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ a @ a ))).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ a @ a ) )),
% 0.98/0.76    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_cn_16])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ a @ a))),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(cn_2, axiom,
% 0.98/0.76    (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ X ) @ X ))).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.98/0.76      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.98/0.76          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(cn_3, axiom,
% 0.98/0.76    (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ) ))).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.98/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.98/0.76          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_3])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(cn_1, axiom,
% 0.98/0.76    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.98/0.76     ( implies @
% 0.98/0.76       ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ 
% 0.98/0.76       ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.98/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.98/0.76          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.98/0.76           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 0.98/0.76            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.98/0.76    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | 
% 0.98/0.76     ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.98/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.98/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.98/0.76          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.98/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.98/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.98/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.98/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.98/0.76              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.98/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.98/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.98/0.76          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.98/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 0.98/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.98/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.98/0.76          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 0.98/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.98/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.98/0.76         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0) @ X2))
% 0.98/0.76          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain,
% 0.98/0.76      (![X0 : $i]:  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.98/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ($false),
% 0.98/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl23])).
% 0.98/0.76  
% 0.98/0.76  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.98/0.76  
% 0.98/0.76  
% 0.98/0.76  % Terminating...
% 1.44/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 1.44/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------