TSTP Solution File: LCL046-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL046-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:11:21 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tBt6K9yoFi/E---3.1_6292.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(cn_1,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tBt6K9yoFi/E---3.1_6292.p',cn_1) ).
cnf(cn_2,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tBt6K9yoFi/E---3.1_6292.p',cn_2) ).
cnf(cn_3,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tBt6K9yoFi/E---3.1_6292.p',cn_3) ).
cnf(prove_cn_16,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tBt6K9yoFi/E---3.1_6292.p',prove_cn_16) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
condensed_detachment ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
cn_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)),
cn_2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X2),X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
cn_3 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,a)),
prove_cn_16 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.09 % Problem : LCL046-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.05/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:55:31 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tBt6K9yoFi/E---3.1_6292.p
% 0.15/0.41 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 6370 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.41 # Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0V with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with pid 6377 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Result found by H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.41 # Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0V with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.15/0.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.15/0.41 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.15/0.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.41 # Generated clauses : 22
% 0.15/0.41 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.15/0.41 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Paramodulations : 22
% 0.15/0.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.15/0.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 21
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.15/0.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.15/0.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.15/0.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.15/0.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 395
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1592 pages
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.41 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.15/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------