TSTP Solution File: LCL045-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL045-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:27:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 34.97s 35.19s
% Output : Refutation 34.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LCL045-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 13:11:41 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36 Sun Jul 3 13:11:41 2022
% 0.14/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 2270.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.14/0.36 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.14/0.36 in usable.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.14/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 7
% 0.14/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 28
% 0.14/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.14/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 5
% 0.14/0.39 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.14/0.39 distinct function count: 2
% 0.14/0.39 distinct constant count: 2
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Changing weight limit from 60 to 49.
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Model 5 [ 1 0 79 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Model 6 [ 1 0 21 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Model 7 [ 1 1 272 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Model 8 [ 1 1 1289 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.35/34.51 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 160 givens.
% 34.35/34.51
% 34.47/34.64
% 34.47/34.64
% 34.47/34.64 Changing weight limit from 49 to 28.
% 34.47/34.64
% 34.47/34.64 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 185 givens.
% 34.47/34.64
% 34.47/34.66
% 34.47/34.66
% 34.47/34.66 Changing weight limit from 28 to 24.
% 34.47/34.66
% 34.47/34.66 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 190 givens.
% 34.47/34.66
% 34.53/34.70
% 34.53/34.70
% 34.53/34.70 Changing weight limit from 24 to 22.
% 34.53/34.70
% 34.53/34.70 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 195 givens.
% 34.53/34.70
% 34.53/34.73
% 34.53/34.73
% 34.53/34.73 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 34.53/34.73
% 34.53/34.73 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 200 givens.
% 34.53/34.73
% 34.53/34.76
% 34.53/34.76
% 34.53/34.76 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 34.53/34.76
% 34.53/34.76 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 210 givens.
% 34.53/34.76
% 34.63/34.79
% 34.63/34.79
% 34.63/34.79 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 34.63/34.79
% 34.63/34.79 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 220 givens.
% 34.63/34.79
% 34.67/34.87
% 34.67/34.87
% 34.67/34.87 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 34.67/34.87
% 34.67/34.87 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 235 givens.
% 34.67/34.87
% 34.81/34.98
% 34.81/34.98
% 34.81/34.98 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 34.81/34.98
% 34.81/34.98 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 250 givens.
% 34.81/34.98
% 34.81/35.06
% 34.81/35.06
% 34.81/35.06 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 34.81/35.06
% 34.81/35.06 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 275 givens.
% 34.81/35.06
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 34.79 sec ----> 11692 [binary,11691.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 4.
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 34.97/35.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 34.97/35.19 % SZS output start Refutation
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 1 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 34.97/35.19 2 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,b),implies(not(b),not(a)))).
% 34.97/35.19 3 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))).
% 34.97/35.19 4 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 34.97/35.19 5 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(B,implies(A,C)))).
% 34.97/35.19 6 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,A),implies(C,B)))).
% 34.97/35.19 7 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(not(A),B),B))).
% 34.97/35.19 9 [hyper,4,1,4] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,B)))).
% 34.97/35.19 26 [hyper,5,1,9] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,A)))).
% 34.97/35.19 27 [hyper,5,1,7] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),implies(implies(A,B),B))).
% 34.97/35.19 56 [hyper,6,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(A,implies(not(B),C)))).
% 34.97/35.19 122 [hyper,26,1,27] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,not(A)))),implies(B,implies(C,not(A))))).
% 34.97/35.19 275 [hyper,56,1,5] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),implies(not(B),C)))).
% 34.97/35.19 11691 [hyper,122,1,275] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(not(B),not(A)))).
% 34.97/35.19 11692 [binary,11691.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 % SZS output end Refutation
% 34.97/35.19 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 ============ end of search ============
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 true clauses given 128 (37.5%)
% 34.97/35.19 false clauses given 213
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 FALSE TRUE
% 34.97/35.19 10 0 64
% 34.97/35.19 11 0 137
% 34.97/35.19 12 163 309
% 34.97/35.19 13 464 483
% 34.97/35.19 14 688 652
% 34.97/35.19 15 1029 773
% 34.97/35.19 16 170 85
% 34.97/35.19 tot: 2514 2503 (49.9% true)
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 Model 8 [ 1 1 1289 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 34.97/35.19
% 34.97/35.19 Process 2270 finished Sun Jul 3 13:12:16 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------