TSTP Solution File: LCL043-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL043-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:23:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7lnHg1M7yI/E---3.1_5187.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(cn_54,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7lnHg1M7yI/E---3.1_5187.p',cn_54) ).
cnf(cn_3,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7lnHg1M7yI/E---3.1_5187.p',cn_3) ).
cnf(cn_18,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7lnHg1M7yI/E---3.1_5187.p',cn_18) ).
cnf(prove_cn_39,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7lnHg1M7yI/E---3.1_5187.p',prove_cn_39) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
condensed_detachment ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X2))),
cn_54 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
cn_3 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X1)),X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(not(X1)),X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
cn_18 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)),
prove_cn_39 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X1)),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : LCL043-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 13:12:23 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7lnHg1M7yI/E---3.1_5187.p
% 0.16/0.44 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 5264 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.44 # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 5270 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.44 # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.44 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.16/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.16/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.16/0.44 # Processed clauses : 26
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.16/0.44 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.16/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 23
% 0.16/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.16/0.44 # Generated clauses : 52
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 40
% 0.16/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Paramodulations : 52
% 0.16/0.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.16/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.16/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21
% 0.16/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 41
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20
% 0.16/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 0.16/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.16/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.16/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 32
% 0.16/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.16/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 779
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.44 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1596 pages
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.16/0.44 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.16/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------