TSTP Solution File: LCL043-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL043-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.74s 1.95s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  10 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   18 (  10   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   3   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (;  23   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ is_a_theorem > implies > #nlpp > not > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(is_a_theorem,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(not,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(implies,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_38,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_36,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(not(X),Y))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_44,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(not(X),Y),Y))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_34,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
      | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_46,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [X_5,Y_6] : is_a_theorem(implies(X_5,implies(Y_6,X_5))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_3,Y_4] : is_a_theorem(implies(X_3,implies(not(X_3),Y_4))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_36]) ).

tff(c_35,plain,
    ! [X_23,Y_24] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X_23,Y_24),implies(implies(not(X_23),Y_24),Y_24))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_44]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [Y_2,X_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Y_2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_1,Y_2)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).

tff(c_56,plain,
    ! [X_31,Y_32] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X_31),Y_32),Y_32))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_31,Y_32)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_35,c_2]) ).

tff(c_61,plain,
    ! [Y_33,X_34] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Y_33)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X_34),Y_33))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_34,Y_33)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_2]) ).

tff(c_836,plain,
    ! [X_113,Y_114] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X_113)),Y_114))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_113,implies(not(not(X_113)),Y_114))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_61]) ).

tff(c_887,plain,
    ! [X_5] : is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X_5)),X_5)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_836]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(a)),a)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).

tff(c_890,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_887,c_14]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : LCL043-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:20:37 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.74/1.95  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.74/1.95  
% 3.74/1.95  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.74/1.98  
% 3.74/1.98  Inference rules
% 3.74/1.98  ----------------------
% 3.74/1.98  #Ref     : 0
% 3.74/1.98  #Sup     : 212
% 3.74/1.98  #Fact    : 0
% 3.74/1.98  #Define  : 0
% 3.74/1.98  #Split   : 2
% 3.74/1.98  #Chain   : 0
% 3.74/1.98  #Close   : 0
% 3.74/1.98  
% 3.74/1.98  Ordering : KBO
% 3.74/1.98  
% 3.74/1.98  Simplification rules
% 3.74/1.98  ----------------------
% 3.74/1.98  #Subsume      : 88
% 3.74/1.98  #Demod        : 19
% 3.74/1.98  #Tautology    : 30
% 3.74/1.98  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.74/1.98  #BackRed      : 1
% 3.74/1.98  
% 3.74/1.98  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.74/1.98  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.74/1.98  
% 3.74/1.98  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.74/1.98  ----------------------
% 3.74/1.98  Preprocessing        : 0.40
% 3.74/1.98  Parsing              : 0.22
% 3.74/1.98  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.74/1.98  Main loop            : 0.53
% 3.74/1.98  Inferencing          : 0.22
% 3.74/1.98  Reduction            : 0.13
% 3.74/1.98  Demodulation         : 0.09
% 3.74/1.98  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.74/1.98  Subsumption          : 0.13
% 3.74/1.98  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.74/1.98  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.74/1.98  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.74/1.98  Total                : 0.97
% 3.74/1.98  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.74/1.98  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.74/1.98  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.74/1.98  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------